These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21262406)

  • 1. Perceived color shift of a shade guide according to the change of illuminant.
    Lee YK; Yu B; Lim JI; Lim HN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Feb; 105(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 21262406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources.
    Curd FM; Jasinevicius TR; Graves A; Cox V; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
    Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lightness, chroma, and hue distributions of a shade guide as measured by a spectroradiometer.
    Lee YK; Yu B; Lim HN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Sep; 104(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 20813231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale.
    Ahn JS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 18589070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides.
    Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 9863448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human-eye versus computerized color matching.
    Yap AU; Sim CP; Loh WL; Teo JH
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 10823085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual whiteness ranking of a Vitapan 3D Master shade guide by untrained assessors.
    Lath DL; Wildgoose DG; Guan H; Lilley TH; Smith RN; Brook AH
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16838875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.