These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21262936)

  • 1. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
    Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial height in Japanese-Brazilian descendants with normal occlusion.
    Vieira FP; Pinzan A; Janson G; Fernandes TM; Sathler RC; Henriques RP
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):54-66. PubMed ID: 25715717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical facial height and proportions of face in Hausa - Fulani children in Northern Nigeria.
    Utomi IL
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15254569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial height comparison in young white and black Brazilian subjects with normal occlusion.
    de Freitas LM; Pinzan A; Janson G; Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):706.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17561045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
    Hannam AG; Wood WW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masseter muscle thickness and mechanical advantage in relation to vertical craniofacial morphology in children.
    Charalampidou M; Kjellberg H; Georgiakaki I; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Feb; 66(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18320415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients.
    Biondi K; Lorusso P; Fastuca R; Mangano A; Zecca PA; Bosco M; Caprioglio A; Levrini L
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 26949239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types.
    Vianna-Lara MS; Caria PH; Tosello Dde O; Lara F; Amorim MM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 19413373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between masseter muscle thickness and maxillofacial morphology in pre-orthodontic treatment patients.
    Soyoye OA; Otuyemi OD; Kolawole KA; Ayoola OO
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):698-711. PubMed ID: 30348502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors.
    Bakke M; Tuxen A; Vilmann P; Jensen BR; Vilmann A; Toft M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Jun; 100(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 1631486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude.
    Raadsheer MC; van Eijden TM; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10065943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repositioning of the masseter muscle and its effect on skeletal growth.
    Bayram B; Uckan S; Cetinsahin A; Arman Ozcirpici A; Ozdemir H; Yazici C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e1-5. PubMed ID: 20416512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of masseter muscles in relation to treatment with removable bite-blocks in dolichofacial growing subjects: A prospective controlled study.
    Lione R; Kiliaridis S; Noviello A; Franchi L; Antonarakis GS; Cozza P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1058-1064. PubMed ID: 28554451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
    de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masseter muscle thickness and maxillary dental arch width.
    Kiliaridis S; Georgiakaki I; Katsaros C
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 12831215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.