These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264567)

  • 1. Waiting to decide helps in the face of probabilistic uncertainty but not delay uncertainty.
    Young ME; Sutherland SC; Cole JJ; Nguyen N
    Learn Behav; 2011 May; 39(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 21264567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnitude effects for experienced rewards at short delays in the escalating interest task.
    Young ME; Webb TL; Sutherland SC; Jacobs EA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 23188742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of number of options on choices involving delayed causation.
    Nguyen N; Young ME; Cole JJ
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(4):455-65. PubMed ID: 21291162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deciding when to "cash in" when outcomes are continuously improving: an escalating interest task.
    Young ME; Webb TL; Jacobs EA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 21871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of reinforcer magnitude on probability and delay discounting of experienced outcomes in a computer game task in humans.
    Greenhow AK; Hunt MJ; Macaskill AC; Harper DN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26377438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Playing a first-person shooter video game induces neuroplastic change.
    Wu S; Cheng CK; Feng J; D'Angelo L; Alain C; Spence I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 24(6):1286-93. PubMed ID: 22264193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in the inference and perception of causal relations within a video game.
    Young ME
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():926. PubMed ID: 25202293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intolerance of uncertainty and decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards.
    Luhmann CC; Ishida K; Hajcak G
    Behav Ther; 2011 Sep; 42(3):378-86. PubMed ID: 21658521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pseudocontingencies and choice behavior in probabilistic environments with context-dependent outcomes.
    Meiser T; Rummel J; Fleig H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):50-67. PubMed ID: 28569527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A delay discounting task produces a greater likelihood of waiting than a deferred gratification task.
    Young ME; McCoy AW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):180-95. PubMed ID: 25515382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What the Future Holds and When: A Description-Experience Gap in Intertemporal Choice.
    Dai J; Pachur T; Pleskac TJ; Hertwig R
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1218-1233. PubMed ID: 31318637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 26676182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of cognitive load on decision making with graphically displayed uncertainty information.
    Allen PM; Edwards JA; Snyder FJ; Makinson KA; Hamby DM
    Risk Anal; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1495-505. PubMed ID: 24354944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a controlled experiment and computational models to measure the impact of sequential peer exposures on decision making.
    Sarkar S; Shakarian P; Sanchez D; Armenta M; Lakkaraju K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0234875. PubMed ID: 32645069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compete, coordinate, and cooperate: How to exploit uncertain environments with social interaction.
    Schulze C; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):967-81. PubMed ID: 26413892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pessimistic outcome expectancy does not explain ambiguity aversion in decision-making under uncertainty.
    Ahrends C; Bravo F; Kringelbach ML; Vuust P; Rohrmeier MA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12177. PubMed ID: 31434966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optogenetic Dissection of Temporal Dynamics of Amygdala-Striatal Interplay during Risk/Reward Decision Making.
    Bercovici DA; Princz-Lebel O; Tse MT; Moorman DE; Floresco SB
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does excessive play of violent first-person-shooter-video-games dampen brain activity in response to emotional stimuli?
    Montag C; Weber B; Trautner P; Newport B; Markett S; Walter NT; Felten A; Reuter M
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 21982747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.