135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264574)
1. Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: immediate and delayed judgments of learning.
Wahlheim CN
Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):827-38. PubMed ID: 21264574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
Metcalfe J; Finn B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of proactive interference (PI) and release from PI on judgments of learning.
Diaz M; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21264631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
Jang Y
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
Metcalfe J; Finn B
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
Dunlosky J; Matvey G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple study trials and judgments of learning.
Meeter M; Nelson TO
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12750044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory.
Ralph A; Walters JN; Stevens A; Fitzgerald KJ; Tehan G; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Turcotte J
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 21264609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.
Hertzog C; Hines JC; Touron DR
Arch Sci Psychol; 2013; 1(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 25914865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resolving semantic and proactive interference in memory over the short-term.
Atkins AS; Berman MG; Reuter-Lorenz PA; Lewis RL; Jonides J
Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):806-17. PubMed ID: 21327614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
