These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264579)

  • 1. Classification versus inference learning contrasted with real-world categories.
    Jones EL; Ross BH
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):764-77. PubMed ID: 21264579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging.
    Wahlheim CN; Dunlosky J; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):750-63. PubMed ID: 21264639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A further investigation of category learning by inference.
    Anderson AL; Ross BH; Chin-Parker S
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 11958345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Typicality effects in artificial categories: is there a hemisphere difference?
    Richards LG; Chiarello C
    Brain Lang; 1990 Jul; 39(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 2207623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.
    Wahlheim CN; Finn B; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):703-16. PubMed ID: 22282159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.
    Yamauchi T; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 10714140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: a comparison of inference learning and classification learning.
    Chin-Parker S; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):216-26. PubMed ID: 14736308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing methods of category learning: Classification versus feature inference.
    Morgan EL; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):710-730. PubMed ID: 32078736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observation versus classification in supervised category learning.
    Levering KR; Kurtz KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):266-82. PubMed ID: 25190494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.
    Lancaster ME; Shelhamer R; Homa D
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 23192309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification.
    Yamauchi T; Love BC; Markman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):585-93. PubMed ID: 12018510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The costs of supervised classification: The effect of learning task on conceptual flexibility.
    Hoffman AB; Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):319-40. PubMed ID: 20438254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of prior knowledge on incidental category learning.
    Clapper JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1558-1577. PubMed ID: 22612162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.
    Goschke T; Bolte A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):394-406. PubMed ID: 17352620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conceptually coherent categories support label-based inductive generalization in preschoolers.
    Booth AE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jul; 123():1-14. PubMed ID: 24632505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.
    Kim S; Rehder B
    Mem Cognit; 2011 May; 39(4):649-65. PubMed ID: 21264587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of category focus at encoding on category frequency estimation strategies.
    Pandelaere M; Hoorens V
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 16686104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.