These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264600)

  • 1. Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar.
    Zimmerer VC; Cowell PE; Varley RA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 21264600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning.
    Skosnik PD; Mirza F; Gitelman DR; Parrish TB; Mesulam MM; Reber PJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1306-14. PubMed ID: 12414270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.
    Beesley T; Wills AJ; Le Pelley ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20081172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning.
    Visser I; Raijmakers ME; Pothos EM
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 19827700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.
    Johansson T
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 19289361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.
    Eitam B; Schul Y; Hassin RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 19058050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning.
    Seger CA
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Jun; 7(2):259-84. PubMed ID: 9690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit learning and reading: insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1457-72. PubMed ID: 24751907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface features can deeply affect artificial grammar learning.
    Jiménez L; Mendes Oliveira H; Soares AP
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102919. PubMed ID: 32200204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grammar or serial order?: discrete combinatorial brain mechanisms reflected by the syntactic mismatch negativity.
    Pulvermüller F; Assadollahi R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):971-80. PubMed ID: 17536967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures.
    de Vries MH; Monaghan P; Knecht S; Zwitserlood P
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 17963740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantics boosts syntax in artificial grammar learning tasks with recursion.
    Fedor A; Varga M; Szathmáry E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):776-82. PubMed ID: 22268913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Öttl B; Jäger G; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1285-1308. PubMed ID: 28484966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information theory and artificial grammar learning: inferring grammaticality from redundancy.
    Jamieson RK; Nevzorova U; Lee G; Mewhort DJ
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 25828458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition.
    Tunney RJ; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1060-71. PubMed ID: 14704021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning.
    Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus set size and statistical coverage of the grammar in artificial grammar learning.
    Poletiek FH; van Schijndel TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1058-64. PubMed ID: 19966255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning.
    Perruchet P; Vinter A; Pacteau C; Gallego J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):485-503. PubMed ID: 12047055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfer in artificial grammar learning: the role of repetition information.
    Lotz A; Kinder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):707-15. PubMed ID: 16822142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.