These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264605)

  • 1. Contribution of strategy use to performance on complex and simple span tasks.
    Bailey H; Dunlosky J; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 21264605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does differential strategy use account for age-related deficits in working-memory performance?
    Bailey H; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19290740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.
    Engle RW; Cantor J; Carullo JJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):972-92. PubMed ID: 1402719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing working memory capacity through time-constrained elementary activities.
    Lucidi A; Loaiza V; Camos V; Barrouillet P
    J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 24846786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: a comparison of strategy assessment methods.
    Dunlosky J; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1227-45. PubMed ID: 17676555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis.
    Bailey H; Dunlosky J; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1383-90. PubMed ID: 19015498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of age on processing and storage in working memory span tasks and reading comprehension.
    Schroeder PJ
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):308-31. PubMed ID: 24785593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity.
    Foster JL; Shipstead Z; Harrison TL; Hicks KL; Redick TS; Engle RW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 25217113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.
    Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):837-49. PubMed ID: 19679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity.
    Kane MJ; Conway ARA; Miura TK; Colflesh GJH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):615-622. PubMed ID: 17470009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.
    Unsworth N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 20022311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The endurance of children's working memory: a recall time analysis.
    Towse JN; Hitch GJ; Hamilton Z; Pirrie S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Oct; 101(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 18479699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.
    McVay JC; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 May; 141(2):302-320. PubMed ID: 21875246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From Brown-Peterson to continual distractor via operation span: A SIMPLE account of complex span.
    Neath I; VanWormer LA; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25383478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates.
    Richmond LL; Burnett LK; Morrison AB; Ball BH
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):780-794. PubMed ID: 34355351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between short-term memory and working memory: complex span made simple?
    Bayliss DM; Jarrold C; Baddeley AD; Gunn DM
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):414-21. PubMed ID: 15948627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events.
    Farmer TA; Fine AB; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):413-433. PubMed ID: 26652283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.