158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264609)
1. Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory.
Ralph A; Walters JN; Stevens A; Fitzgerald KJ; Tehan G; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Turcotte J
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 21264609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.
Tehan G; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):477-89. PubMed ID: 9610119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference.
Tehan G; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 7731363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
Goh WD; Tan H
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there an effect on all trials?
Saint-Aubin J; Ouellette D; Poirier M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 15945210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proactive interference in a semantic short-term memory deficit: role of semantic and phonological relatedness.
Hamilton AC; Martin RC
Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 17334211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: immediate and delayed judgments of learning.
Wahlheim CN
Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):827-38. PubMed ID: 21264574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cuing effects in short-term recall.
Tehan G; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):719-32. PubMed ID: 8961817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
Coltheart V
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Capacity limits in list item recognition: evidence from proactive interference.
Cowan N; Johnson TD; Saults JS
Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):293-9. PubMed ID: 15952261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for proactive interference in the focus of attention of working memory.
Carroll LM; Jalbert A; Penney AM; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Tehan G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 20873917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repetition learning in the immediate serial recall of visual and auditory materials.
Page MP; Cumming N; Norris D; Hitch GJ; McNeil AM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):716-33. PubMed ID: 16822143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positional cues in serial learning: the spin-list technique.
Kahana MJ; Mollison MV; Addis KM
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19966242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: mechanisms of change.
Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 21264624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.
Kane MJ; Engle RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 10764100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.
Oberauer K
Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 19246349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression.
Bhatarah P; Ward G; Smith J; Hayes L
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jul; 37(5):689-713. PubMed ID: 19487760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reversing the phonological similarity effect.
Nairne JS; Kelley MR
Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 10087855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
