These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264631)
21. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory. England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning. Castel AD Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring. Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments. Halamish V; Undorf M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs). Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge. Tiede HL; Leboe JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information. Wahlheim CN Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 25120241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both? Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning. Tauber SK; Rhodes MG Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test. Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Age invariance in feeling of knowing during implicit interference effects. Eakin DK; Hertzog C J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Sep; 67(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 22367709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects? Pyc MA; Rawson KA Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter? Goh WD; Tan H Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning. Zimdahl MF; Undorf M Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning. Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Immunity to proactive interference is not a property of the focus of attention in working memory. Ralph A; Walters JN; Stevens A; Fitzgerald KJ; Tehan G; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Turcotte J Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 21264609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS). McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children. Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. When disfluency is--and is not--a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Yue CL; Castel AD; Bjork RA Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 22976883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]