These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264634)

  • 1. Not all sources of familiarity are created equal: the case of word frequency and repetition in episodic recognition.
    Coane JH; Balota DA; Dolan PO; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):791-805. PubMed ID: 21264634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: levels-of-processing effects on familiarity.
    Toth JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Mar; 50(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 8653094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.
    Ozubko JD; Gopie N; MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 22127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 16752588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
    Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition errors suggest fast familiarity and slow recollection in rhesus monkeys.
    Basile BM; Hampton RR
    Learn Mem; 2013 Jul; 20(8):431-7. PubMed ID: 23864646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.
    Arndt J; Jones TC
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jul; 36(5):899-912. PubMed ID: 18630197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect.
    Bridger EK; Bader R; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():179-90. PubMed ID: 24675676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.
    Park H; Reder LM; Dickison D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):568-78. PubMed ID: 15910138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contributions of familiarity and recollection rejection to recognition: evidence from the time course of false recognition for semantic and conjunction lures.
    Matzen LE; Taylor EG; Benjamin AS
    Memory; 2011 Jan; 19(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21240745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory.
    Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 9949705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the mental representation underlying familiarity assessment.
    Dopkins S; Sargent J; Ngo CT
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 23046415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a recognition memory deficit in Parkinson's disease? Evidence from estimates of recollection and familiarity.
    Weiermann B; Stephan MA; Kaelin-Lang A; Meier B
    Int J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 120(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 20374089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of test structure in creating false memories.
    Coane JH; McBride DM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17128601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.
    Edmonds EC; Glisky EL; Bartlett JC; Rapcsak SZ
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21787088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.