These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264634)

  • 21. Modality effects in sentence recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating the frequency of nonevents: the role of recollection failure in false recognition.
    Brown NR; Buchanan L; Cabeza R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):684-91. PubMed ID: 11206210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis.
    McElree B; Dolan PO; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 May; 25(3):563-82. PubMed ID: 10368927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition.
    Gardiner JM; Java RI
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 2314224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. False memory in a short-term memory task.
    Coane JH; McBride DM; Raulerson BA; Jordan JS
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 17341016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Memory conjunction clusters: Influence of familiarity and recollection.
    Leding JK
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 26284615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory.
    Guttentag RE; Carroll D
    Memory; 1994 Sep; 2(3):255-73. PubMed ID: 7584295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: effects of interference and of response speed.
    Yonelinas AP; Jacoby LL
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Dec; 48(4):516-35. PubMed ID: 7866392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conjunction errors and semantic transparency.
    Wong M; Rotello CM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19966238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Word type effects in false recall: concrete, abstract, and emotion word critical lures.
    Bauer LM; Olheiser EL; Altarriba J; Landi N
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):469-81. PubMed ID: 20066926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of recollection and familiarity in the formation and updating of associative representations.
    Ozubko JD; Moscovitch M; Winocur G
    Learn Mem; 2017 Jul; 24(7):298-309. PubMed ID: 28620077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Distinctive encoding reduces the Jacoby-Whitehouse illusion.
    Gallo DA; Perlmutter DH; Moore CD; Schacrer DL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):461-6. PubMed ID: 18426074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Old processes, new perspectives: Familiarity is correlated with (not independent of) recollection and is more (not equally) variable for targets than for lures.
    Moran R; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():40-67. PubMed ID: 25899705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model.
    Dopkins S; Galyer D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102933. PubMed ID: 31739089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Remembering words not presented in sentences: how study context changes patterns of false memories.
    Matzen LE; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 19103975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differential effects of list strength on recollection and familiarity.
    Norman KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1083-94. PubMed ID: 12450334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lexico-semantic structure and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.
    Monaco JD; Abbott LF; Kahana MJ
    Learn Mem; 2007 Mar; 14(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 17351146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory.
    Diana RA; Peterson MJ; Reder LM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 15117001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.