These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264639)

  • 1. Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging.
    Wahlheim CN; Dunlosky J; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):750-63. PubMed ID: 21264639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The exemplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations.
    Zulkiply N; Burt JS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 22886736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification versus inference learning contrasted with real-world categories.
    Jones EL; Ross BH
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):764-77. PubMed ID: 21264579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.
    Wahlheim CN; Finn B; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):703-16. PubMed ID: 22282159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spacing as the friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults.
    Kornell N; Castel AD; Eich TS; Bjork RA
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Jun; 25(2):498-503. PubMed ID: 20545435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexible remembering.
    Koutstaal W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 16724773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive influences on study time allocation in an associative recognition task: An analysis of adult age differences.
    Hines JC; Touron DR; Hertzog C
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Jun; 24(2):462-75. PubMed ID: 19485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
    Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.
    Kelemen WL; Frost PJ; Weaver CA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 10714142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: the roles of discrimination and retrieval.
    Birnbaum MS; Kornell N; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 23138567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.
    Toppino TC; Fearnow-Kenney MD; Kiepert MH; Teremula AC
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 19246346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of contingency and contiguity in young and older adults' causal learning.
    Mutter SA; DeCaro MS; Plumlee LF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2009 May; 64(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 19299255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 18578849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of aging on priming and skill learning.
    Hashtroudi S; Chrosniak LD; Schwartz BL
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Dec; 6(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 1777149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit.
    Yan VX; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jul; 145(7):918-33. PubMed ID: 27227415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. People mind wander more during massed than spaced inductive learning.
    Metcalfe J; Xu J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):978-984. PubMed ID: 26618908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Order of acquisition in learning perceptual categories: a laboratory analogue of the age-of-acquisition effect?
    Stewart N; Ellis AW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 18605482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.
    Yamauchi T; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 10714140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Learning in old age: The importance of self-initiated structuring].
    Kliegel M; Altgassen M; Martin M; Kruse A
    Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2003 Dec; 36(6):421-8. PubMed ID: 14685731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Coane JH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1441-51. PubMed ID: 20804279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.