These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264700)

  • 1. Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 21264700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction and the auditory attentional blink.
    Horváth J; Burgyán A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 21264693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective impairment of auditory selective attention under concurrent cognitive load.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 21928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.
    Horváth J; Roeber U; Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1229():193-203. PubMed ID: 18634759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence.
    Roeber U; Berti S; Müller D; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):425-38. PubMed ID: 19207193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes.
    Yucel G; Petty C; McCarthy G; Belger A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16356321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.