These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264719)

  • 21. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers.
    Fecteau JH
    J Vis; 2007 Apr; 7(6):1. PubMed ID: 17685784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.
    Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal position priming: memory traces of recent experience bias the allocation of attention in time.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1443-56. PubMed ID: 23339347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Redundancy gains in pop-out visual search are determined by top-down task set: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Grubert A; Krummenacher J; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.
    Muller HJ; Reimann B; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.
    Huang L; Holcombe AO; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 15078040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of interference and retention delay on temporal generalization performance.
    Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1903-12. PubMed ID: 20952787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming.
    Lamy D; Zivony A; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(19):2099-109. PubMed ID: 21784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Priming from distractors in rapid serial visual presentation is modulated by image properties and attention.
    Harris IM; Benito CT; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1595-608. PubMed ID: 20718560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relative contributions of task-relevant and task-irrelevant dimensions in priming of pop-out.
    Michal AL; Lleras A; Beck DM
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25311302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
    Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Levels-of-processing effects in infant memory?
    Adler SA; Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    Child Dev; 1998 Apr; 69(2):280-94. PubMed ID: 9586205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.