These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264719)

  • 41. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.
    Caddigan E; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces.
    Hershler O; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Permeability of priming of pop out to expectations.
    Pascucci D; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Increases in rewards promote flexible behavior.
    Shen YJ; Chun MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):938-52. PubMed ID: 21264699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
    Lu S; Han S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Task switching under predictable and unpredictable circumstances.
    Andreadis N; Quinlan PT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1776-90. PubMed ID: 20952777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
    Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Featural guidance in conjunction search: the contrast between orientation and color.
    Anderson GM; Heinke D; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1108-27. PubMed ID: 20718568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intertrial repetition affects perception: the role of focused attention.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):3. PubMed ID: 21131563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Direct versus indirect processing changes the influence of color in natural scene categorization.
    Otsuka S; Kawaguchi J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1588-97. PubMed ID: 19801618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Re-examining Maljkovic and Nakayama (1994): Conscious expectancy does affect the Priming of Pop-out effect.
    Cochrane BA; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2693-2702. PubMed ID: 32333373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.