202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264728)
1. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production.
Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The representation of shape in the context of visual object categorization tasks.
Op de Beeck H; Béatse E; Wagemans J; Sunaert S; Van Hecke P
Neuroimage; 2000 Jul; 12(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 10875900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli.
Stewart N; Brown GD; Chater N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11831211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects.
Maes JH; Damen MD; Eling PA
Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15050775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Categorization and abstraction abilities in 3-year-old children: a comparison with monkey data.
Bovet D; Vauclair J; Blaye A
Anim Cogn; 2005 Jan; 8(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 15300466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of frequency of feedback on transfer in concept identification.
Schroth ML
Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 9100341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach.
Pothos EM; Close J
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):581-602. PubMed ID: 18083157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The representation of moving 3-D objects in apparent motion perception.
Hidaka S; Kawachi Y; Gyoba J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1294-304. PubMed ID: 19633345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
Smith JD; Minda JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical evaluation of the axioms of multiplicativity, commutativity, and monotonicity in ratio production of area.
Augustin T; Maier K
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):208-16. PubMed ID: 18657794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.
Verheyen S; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1515-31. PubMed ID: 21767056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Category induction in autism: slower, perhaps different, but certainly possible.
Soulières I; Mottron L; Giguère G; Larochelle S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Feb; 64(2):311-27. PubMed ID: 20623440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Localizing the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect.
Müsseler J; Stork S; Kerzel D
Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 18207214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Naive optics: acting on mirror reflections.
Hecht H; Bertamini M; Gamer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1023-38. PubMed ID: 16262496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions.
Shuren JE; Jacobs DH; Heilman KM
Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 9220092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
