These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264730)

  • 21. Distraction and the auditory attentional blink.
    Horváth J; Burgyán A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 21264693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. No differential attentional blink in dyslexia after controlling for baseline sensitivity.
    Badcock NA; Hogben JH; Fletcher JF
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(13):1497-502. PubMed ID: 18466946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
    Stein T; Vallines I; Schneider WX
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1277-81. PubMed ID: 18695507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Different attentional blink tasks reflect distinct information processing limitations: an individual differences approach.
    Kelly AJ; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1867-73. PubMed ID: 22004195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
    Kihara K; Yagi Y; Takeda Y; Kawahara JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):168-79. PubMed ID: 20731524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.
    Kawahara JI; Kihara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrophysiological evidence for both perceptual and postperceptual selection during the attentional blink.
    Giesbrecht B; Sy JL; Elliott JC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2005-18. PubMed ID: 17892389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intramodal and crossmodal processing delays in the attentional blink paradigm revealed by event-related potentials.
    Ptito A; Arnell K; Jolicoeur P; Macleod J
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 18627533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention.
    Olivers CN; Nieuwenhuis S
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 15828972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional blink magnitude.
    MacLean MH; Arnell KM; Cote KA
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Apr; 78(3):218-29. PubMed ID: 22281183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional blink deficits observed in dyslexia depend on task demands.
    Buchholz J; Aimola Davies A
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1292-302. PubMed ID: 17408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alerting enhances target identification but does not affect the magnitude of the attentional blink.
    Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):405-19. PubMed ID: 21264721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deficits in selective attention in symptomatic Huntington disease: assessment using an attentional blink paradigm.
    Georgiou-Karistianis N; Farrow M; Wilson-Ching M; Churchyard A; Bradshaw JL; Sheppard DM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2012 Mar; 25(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22310306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Target sparing effects in the attentional blink depend on type of stimulus.
    Livesey EJ; Harris IM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2104-23. PubMed ID: 21751050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An investigation into the temporal dimension of the Mozart effect: evidence from the attentional blink task.
    Ho C; Mason O; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 16942739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional blink in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Kavcic V; Scheid E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 21145330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching.
    Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The attentional blink within and across the hemispheres: Evidence from a patient with a complete section of the corpus callosum.
    Ptito A; Brisson B; Dell'Acqua R; Lassonde M; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19539687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.