These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264748)

  • 21. The sound of size: crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: a combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study.
    Bien N; ten Oever S; Goebel R; Sack AT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):663-72. PubMed ID: 21787871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Synaesthetic interactions across vision and audition.
    Krugliak A; Noppeney U
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():65-73. PubMed ID: 26427739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural basis of the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.
    McCormick K; Lacey S; Stilla R; Nygaard LC; Sathian K
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():19-30. PubMed ID: 29501792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues: a review.
    Spence C; Santangelo V
    Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 258(1-2):134-42. PubMed ID: 19409472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-correlation between auditory and visual signals promotes multisensory integration.
    Parise CV; Harrar V; Ernst MO; Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 23964482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines.
    Parise CV
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):7-28. PubMed ID: 27311289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing.
    Turatto M; Mazza V; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):B55-64. PubMed ID: 15925569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiovisual interactions depend on context of congruency.
    Sarmiento BR; Shore DI; Milliken B; Sanabria D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 22160743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audio-visual crossmodal correspondences in domestic dogs (
    Korzeniowska AT; Root-Gutteridge H; Simner J; Reby D
    Biol Lett; 2019 Nov; 15(11):20190564. PubMed ID: 31718513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The representation of space near the body through touch and vision.
    Macaluso E; Maravita A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):782-95. PubMed ID: 19837101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crossmodal correspondences between sounds and tastes.
    Knöferle K; Spence C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 23055144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation.
    Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 18207117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-pitch sounds small for domestic dogs: abstract crossmodal correspondences between auditory pitch and visual size.
    Korzeniowska AT; Simner J; Root-Gutteridge H; Reby D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Feb; 9(2):211647. PubMed ID: 35154798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Steady state visual evoked potentials reveal a signature of the pitch-size crossmodal association in visual cortex.
    Sciortino P; Kayser C
    Neuroimage; 2023 Jun; 273():120093. PubMed ID: 37028733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.
    Calvert GA; Hansen PC; Iversen SD; Brammer MJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 11467916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lightness/pitch and elevation/pitch crossmodal correspondences are low-level sensory effects.
    Zeljko M; Kritikos A; Grove PM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1609-1623. PubMed ID: 30697648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects.
    Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Menz MM; Ptito M; Röder B; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1566-77. PubMed ID: 21334444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains.
    Walker L; Walker P; Francis B
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23469700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.