These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21264784)

  • 21. Functional importance of connective tissue repair during the development of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Huffman MD; Curci JA; Moore G; Kerns DB; Starcher BC; Thompson RW
    Surgery; 2000 Sep; 128(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 10965315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta.
    Vande Geest JP; Sacks MS; Vorp DA
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1324-34. PubMed ID: 15885699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computational rupture prediction of AAAs: what needs to be done next?
    Doyle BJ; Hoskins PR; McGloughlin TM
    J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 21521063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Flow dynamics in anatomical models of abdominal aortic aneurysms: computational analysis of pulsatile flow.
    Finol EA; Amon CH
    Acta Cient Venez; 2003; 54(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14515766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Papaharilaou Y; Ekaterinaris JA; Manousaki E; Katsamouris AN
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 16500664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computational analysis of biomechanical contributors to possible endovascular graft failure.
    Li Z; Kleinstreuer C; Farber M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2005 Dec; 4(4):221-34. PubMed ID: 16270200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anisotropic AAA: computational comparison between four and two fiber family material models.
    Di Achille P; Celi S; Di Puccio F; Forte P
    J Biomech; 2011 Sep; 44(13):2418-26. PubMed ID: 21767843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stereoscopically observed deformations of a compliant abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
    Meyer CA; Bertrand E; Boiron O; Deplano V
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Nov; 133(11):111004. PubMed ID: 22168736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of biomechanical factors affecting stent-graft migration in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
    Li Z; Kleinstreuer C
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2264-73. PubMed ID: 16153654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
    Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical behavior of the abdominal aortic aneurysm assessed by biaxial tests in the rat xenograft model.
    Marais L; Zidi M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():28-34. PubMed ID: 28527353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Novel mechanisms of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Lu H; Rateri DL; Bruemmer D; Cassis LA; Daugherty A
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2012 Oct; 14(5):402-12. PubMed ID: 22833280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calibration of parameters for cardiovascular models with application to arterial growth.
    Kehl S; Gee MW
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 27501849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between the mechanical behaviour of the human healthy AA and commercial prostheses under various mechanical loadings.
    Lemercier A; Bailly L; Geindreau C; Toungara M; Latil P; Orgéas L; Deplano V; Boucard N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16 Suppl 1():315-7. PubMed ID: 23923956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numerical simulations of stochastic circulatory models.
    Wimmer G; Dedík L; Michal M; Mudríková A; Durisová M
    Bull Math Biol; 1999 Mar; 61(2):365-77. PubMed ID: 17883215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Random effects models for estimation of the probability and time to progression of a continuous biomarker.
    Reddy T; Molenberghs G; Bruckers L; Njagi EN; Aerts M; Willem Schurink G
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Nov; 18(6):671-687. PubMed ID: 31309691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. AAAS cautions against germ line gene therapy.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1127. PubMed ID: 11062396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimized hyaluronic acid-hydrogel design and culture conditions for preservation of mesenchymal stem cell properties.
    Mohand-Kaci F; Assoul N; Martelly I; Allaire E; Zidi M
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2013 Apr; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 22992013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stochastic modelling of wall stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms treated by a gene therapy.
    Mohand-Kaci F; Ouni AE; Dai J; Allaire E; Zidi M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 21264784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical behavior of abdominal aorta aneurysm in rat model treated by cell therapy using mesenchymal stem cells.
    Zidi M; Allaire E
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 24781283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.