These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21265037)

  • 1. A case study on multiple-choice testing in anatomical sciences.
    Golda SD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21265037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-answer examinations improve student performance in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.
    Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Prihoda TJ; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):950-61. PubMed ID: 19648566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral anatomy laboratory examinations in a physical therapy program.
    Fabrizio PA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 23225627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experience with the written examination (multiple choice test) in the teaching of anatomy].
    Lischka MF; Krammer EB; Mayr R; Gruber H; Moser GW; Reisinger L
    Anat Anz; 1975; 137(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1163811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance in a prematriculation gross anatomy course as a predictor of performance in medical school.
    Tucker RP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 19177416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalence of students' scores on timed and untimed anatomy practical examinations.
    Zhang G; Fenderson BA; Schmidt RR; Veloski JJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 23463722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weekly quizzes in extended-matching format as a means of monitoring students' progress in gross anatomy.
    Lukić IK; Gluncić V; Katavić V; Petanjek Z; Jalsovec D; Marusić A
    Ann Anat; 2001 Nov; 183(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 11766531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Student laboratory presentations as a learning tool in anatomy education.
    Chollet MB; Teaford MF; Garofalo EM; DeLeon VB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):260-4. PubMed ID: 19810121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC).
    Schubert S; Schnabel KP; Winkelmann A
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 19253152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of anatomical knowledge by practical examinations: The effect of question design on student performance.
    Sagoo MG; Smith CF; Gosden E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 26840187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative anatomy course.
    Rizzolo LJ; Rando WC; O'Brien MK; Haims AH; Abrahams JJ; Stewart WB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(3):109-20. PubMed ID: 20496432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections.
    Nnodim JO; Ohanaka EC; Osuji CU
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 8793221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomy practical examinations: how does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?
    Inuwa IM; Taranikanti V; Al-Rawahy M; Habbal O
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 21916021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between premedical coursework in gross anatomy and histology and medical school performance in gross anatomy and histology.
    Forester JP; McWhorter DL; Cole MS
    Clin Anat; 2002 Mar; 15(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 11877798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of multiple choice practical examinations as an alternative to traditional free response examination formats in gross anatomy.
    Shaibah HS; van der Vleuten CP
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 23109285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized grading of anatomy laboratory practical examinations.
    Krippendorf BB; Bolender DL; Kolesari GL
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 19177415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
    Granger NA; Calleson D
    Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.