131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21265452)
1. Spatial patterns of fishing effort off San Diego: implications for zonal management and ecosystem function.
Parnell PE; Dayton PK; Fisher RA; Loarie CC; Darrow RD
Ecol Appl; 2010 Dec; 20(8):2203-22. PubMed ID: 21265452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large-scale, multidecade monitoring data from kelp forest ecosystems in California and Oregon (USA).
Malone DP; Davis K; Lonhart SI; Parsons-Field A; Caselle JE; Carr MH
Ecology; 2022 May; 103(5):e3630. PubMed ID: 35048367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Historical ecology and the conservation of large, hermaphroditic fishes in Pacific Coast kelp forest ecosystems.
Braje TJ; Rick TC; Szpak P; Newsome SD; McCain JM; Elliott Smith EA; Glassow M; Hamilton SL
Sci Adv; 2017 Feb; 3(2):e1601759. PubMed ID: 28164155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interaction of ecological and angler processes: experimental stocking in an open access, spatially structured fishery.
Mee JA; Post JR; Ward H; Wilson KL; Newton E; Cantin A
Ecol Appl; 2016 Sep; 26(6):1693-1707. PubMed ID: 27755695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trophic cascades induced by lobster fishing are not ubiquitous in southern California kelp forests.
Guenther CM; Lenihan HS; Grant LE; Lopez-Carr D; Reed DC
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49396. PubMed ID: 23209573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cascading effects of fishing can alter carbon flow through a temperate coastal ecosystem.
Salomon AK; Shears NT; Langlois TJ; Babcock RC
Ecol Appl; 2008 Dec; 18(8):1874-87. PubMed ID: 19263885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploitation and recovery of a sea urchin predator has implications for the resilience of southern California kelp forests.
Hamilton SL; Caselle JE
Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jan; 282(1799):20141817. PubMed ID: 25500572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing fishing effort and spatial extent of coastal fisheries.
Stewart KR; Lewison RL; Dunn DC; Bjorkland RH; Kelez S; Halpin PN; Crowder LB
PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e14451. PubMed ID: 21206903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dietary niche expansion of a kelp forest predator recovering from intense commercial exploitation.
Hamilton SL; Newsome SD; Caselle JE
Ecology; 2014 Jan; 95(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 24649656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.
Gil M; Ramil F; AgÍs JA
Zootaxa; 2020 Nov; 4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. PubMed ID: 33311142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tracking the response of industrial fishing fleets to large marine protected areas in the Pacific Ocean.
White TD; Ong T; Ferretti F; Block BA; McCauley DJ; Micheli F; De Leo GA
Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1571-1578. PubMed ID: 33031635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying recreational shore angling catch and harvest in southern Portugal (north-east Atlantic Ocean): implications for conservation and integrated fisheries management.
Veiga P; Ribeiro J; Gonçalves JM; Erzini K
J Fish Biol; 2010 Jun; 76(9):2216-37. PubMed ID: 20557660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating patterns and drivers of spatial change in the recreational guided fishing sector in Alaska.
Chan MN; Beaudreau AH; Loring PA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179584. PubMed ID: 28632745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patterns in artisanal coral reef fisheries revealed through local monitoring efforts.
Delaney DG; Teneva LT; Stamoulis KA; Giddens JL; Koike H; Ogawa T; Friedlander AM; Kittinger JN
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4089. PubMed ID: 29226033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High resolution assessment of commercial fisheries activity along the US West Coast using Vessel Monitoring System data with a case study using California groundfish fisheries.
Wang YH; Ruttenberg BI; Walter RK; Pendleton F; Samhouri JF; Liu OR; White C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0298868. PubMed ID: 38843128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. North Sea demersal fisheries prefer specific benthic habitats.
van der Reijden KJ; Hintzen NT; Govers LL; Rijnsdorp AD; Olff H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208338. PubMed ID: 30562357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No-take marine protected areas enhance the benefits of kelp-forest restoration for fish but not fisheries.
Hopf JK; Caselle JE; White JW
Ecol Lett; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 35596734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporation of recreational fishing effort into design of marine protected areas.
Lynch TP
Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1466-76. PubMed ID: 17002764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of regional angling effort, angler behavior, and harvesting efficiency on landscape patterns of overfishing.
Hunt LM; Arlinghaus R; Lester N; Kushneriuk R
Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2555-75. PubMed ID: 22073644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
