BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2126555)

  • 1. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations.
    Saunders WP; Grieve AR; Russell EM; Alani AH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 17(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 2126555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations--long-term studies.
    Grieve AR; Saunders WP; Alani AH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 20(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
    Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu I; Ulusu T; Genç Y
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
    Yap AU; Ho KS; Wong KM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. Part 2. The influence of bonding systems.
    Martin FE; Kingsford Smith ED; Andrews N
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Jun; 37(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 1385695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of Gluma Bond, Scotchbond 2 and a glass ionomer/composite sandwich technique.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Scarbrough AR; Hembree JH
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 2127533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage in three designs of glass ionomer under composite resin restorations.
    Gordon M; Wasserstein A; Gorfil C; Imber S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Mar; 18(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 2037937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mixed Class V restorations: the potential of a dentine bonding agent.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1990 Oct; 18(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 2150072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leakage of a light-activated base: effect of dentin bonding agents.
    Chan KC; Swift EJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):790-2. PubMed ID: 1649303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal seal of new-generation dental bonding agents.
    Chan KC; Swift EJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):420-3. PubMed ID: 7527462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assessment of marginal sealing using 7 dentin adhesive systems.
    Zivković S
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):423-9. PubMed ID: 11203961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro marginal microleakage associated with five dentine bonding systems and associated composite restorations.
    Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Martin DM
    J Dent; 1990 Aug; 18(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 2212203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.