477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21265601)
1. Tonal expectations influence early pitch processing.
Marmel F; Perrin F; Tillmann B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3095-104. PubMed ID: 21265601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Priming in melody perception: tracking down the strength of cognitive expectations.
Marmel F; Tillmann B; Delbé C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):1016-28. PubMed ID: 20695715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Musical scale properties are automatically processed in the human auditory cortex.
Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Näätänen R; Peretz I
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1117(1):162-74. PubMed ID: 16963000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Event-related potential (ERP) markers of melodic processing: The N2 component is modulated by structural complexity, not by melodic 'meaningfulness'.
Minati L; Salvatoni L; Rosazza C; Pietrocini E; Visani E; Panzica F; Scaioli V; Avanzini G; Franceschetti S
Brain Res Bull; 2010 Aug; 83(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 20600678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in Mandarin Chinese.
Marie C; Delogu F; Lampis G; Belardinelli MO; Besson M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2701-15. PubMed ID: 20946053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tonal expectations influence pitch perception.
Marmel F; Tillmann B; Dowling WJ
Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jul; 70(5):841-52. PubMed ID: 18613632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combined model of sensory and cognitive representations underlying tonal expectations in music: from audio signals to behavior.
Collins T; Tillmann B; Barrett FS; Delbé C; Janata P
Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 24490788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: an ERP study of music perception.
Koelsch S; Jentschke S; Sammler D; Mietchen D
Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):476-90. PubMed ID: 17433099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The sound of music: differentiating musicians using a fast, musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
Vuust P; Brattico E; Seppänen M; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1432-43. PubMed ID: 22414595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implicit investigations of tonal knowledge in nonmusician listeners.
Tillmann B
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():100-10. PubMed ID: 16597757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissociable pitch processing mechanisms in lexical and melodic contexts revealed by ERPs.
Nan Y; Friederici AD; Shu H; Luo YJ
Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1263():104-13. PubMed ID: 19368839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attending to pitch information inhibits processing of pitch information: the curious case of amusia.
Zendel BR; Lagrois MÉ; Robitaille N; Peretz I
J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 35(9):3815-24. PubMed ID: 25740512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Processing of pitch and time sequences in music.
Neuhaus C; Knösche TR
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18584960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure.
Fujioka T; Trainor LJ; Ross B; Kakigi R; Pantev C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1010-21. PubMed ID: 15298788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive vs. affective listening modes and judgments of music--an ERP study.
Brattico E; Jacobsen T; De Baene W; Glerean E; Tervaniemi M
Biol Psychol; 2010 Dec; 85(3):393-409. PubMed ID: 20837091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of significance of auditory location changes on event related brain potentials and pitch discrimination performance.
Koistinen S; Rinne T; Cederström S; Alho K
Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1427():44-53. PubMed ID: 22055456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ERP correlates of pre-attentive processing of Cantonese lexical tones: The effects of pitch contour and pitch height.
Tsang YK; Jia S; Huang J; Chen HC
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20970477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
