204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21265602)
1. Cooperative and opposing effects of strategic and involuntary attention.
Mazza V; Dallabona M; Chelazzi L; Turatto M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2838-51. PubMed ID: 21265602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maintenance of tactile short-term memory for locations is mediated by spatial attention.
Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 21925566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory.
Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Toffanin P; Luria R; Jolicoeur P
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional capture by working memory contents.
Pan Y
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 20565178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search.
Soto D; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 16529778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search.
Qi S; Zeng Q; Ding C; Li H
Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1532():32-43. PubMed ID: 23916733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study.
Trenner MU; Schweinberger SR; Jentzsch I; Sommer W
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 15511654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinction between perceptual and attentional processing in working memory tasks: a study of phase-locked and induced oscillatory brain dynamics.
Deiber MP; Missonnier P; Bertrand O; Gold G; Fazio-Costa L; Ibañez V; Giannakopoulos P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):158-72. PubMed ID: 17214572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
Wykowska A; Schubö A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial congruence in working memory: an ERP study.
Zhou B; Zhang JX; Tan LH; Han S
Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2795-9. PubMed ID: 15597057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age differences in target detection and interference resolution in working memory: an event-related potential study.
Tays WJ; Dywan J; Mathewson KJ; Segalowitz SJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2250-62. PubMed ID: 18457511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
