These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21266561)
1. Effect of membrane sweeping on cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography and impact of cervical shortening on cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Khine PP; Sabdin NH; Vallikkannu N; Sulaiman S J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Feb; 30(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 21266561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters. Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Ware V; Raynor BD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1030-2. PubMed ID: 10819818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Yanik A; Gülümser C; Tosun M Adv Ther; 2007; 24(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 17901024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. Park KH J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Transvaginal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix before induction of labor]. Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quéreux C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Dec; 29(12):919-23. PubMed ID: 11802557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Kim SN; Park KH; Jung HJ; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20586108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix in predicting successful membrane sweeping: a prospective observational study. Rizzo G; Aloisio F; Yacoub M; Bitsadze V; Słodki M; Makatsariya A; D'Antonio F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):852-858. PubMed ID: 31092080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women. Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of sweeping the membranes on cervical length and labor: a randomized clinical trial. Parlakgumus HA; Yalcinkaya C; Haydardedeoglu B; Tarim E Ginekol Pol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):682-7. PubMed ID: 25322540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography. Pereira S; Frick AP; Poon LC; Zamprakou A; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24832011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies. Kim YN; Kwon JY; Kim EH J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 32390283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]