383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21267588)
1. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.
Demirpehlivan IA; Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Ciger E; Can N
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 21267588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perichondrium/Cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty.
Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Oncel S; Songu M; Kopar A; Demiray U
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 21777547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique for reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforation: anatomic and audiologic results.
Ulkü CH
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2010; 20(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20163331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series.
Dornhoffer J
Laryngoscope; 2003 Nov; 113(11):1844-56. PubMed ID: 14603038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.
Tek A; Karaman M; Uslu C; Habeşoğlu T; Kılıçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Esen S; Egeli E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21968630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in tympanoplasty after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children.
Anderson J; Cayé-Thomasen P; Tos M
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):856-63. PubMed ID: 15547412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique.
Kazikdas KC; Onal K; Boyraz I; Karabulut E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 264(9):985-9. PubMed ID: 17401572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media.
Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Demiray U; Demirpehlivan IA
J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Jan; 126(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 22032518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.
Özdamar K; Sen A
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 31771648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten-year results of cartilage palisades versus fascia in eardrum reconstruction after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children.
Cayé-Thomasen P; Andersen J; Uzun C; Hansen S; Tos M
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):944-52. PubMed ID: 19358204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the tragal cartilage necessary for type 1 tympanoplasties?
Sözen E; Orhan Uçal Y; Tansuker HD; Uslu Coşkun B; Yasemin Korkut A; Dadaş B
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):e280-3. PubMed ID: 22801150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different grafting techniques in type I tympanoplasty in cases of significant middle ear granulation.
Lee JC; Lee SR; Nam JK; Lee TH; Kwon JK
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 22429943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic tympanoplasty with limited tympanomeatal flap elevation in pediatric cases: comparison of anatomic and audiological results of grafts.
Şen A; Özdamar K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 276(9):2427-2432. PubMed ID: 31187239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: Comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts.
Çayir S; Kayabaşi S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 121():95-98. PubMed ID: 30878559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does cartilage tympanoplasty impair hearing in patients with normal preoperative hearing? A comparison of different techniques.
Balcı MK; İşlek A; Ciğer E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):673-677. PubMed ID: 30600345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of type I tympanoplasty on the resonant frequency of the middle ear: comparison between chondrotympanoplasty and temporalis fascia grafting.
Iacovou E; Vlastarakos PV; Panagiotakopoulou A; Chrysostomou M; Kandiloros D; Adamopoulos G; Ferekidis E
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 22498263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty.
Vashishth A; Mathur NN; Choudhary SR; Bhardwaj A
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Oct; 41(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 24925703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new grafting technique for tympanoplasty: tympanoplasty with a boomerang-shaped chondroperichondrial graft (TwBSCPG).
Dündar R; Soy FK; Kulduk E; Muluk NB; Cingi C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 271(10):2687-94. PubMed ID: 24129694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results.
Ozbek C; Ciftçi O; Tuna EE; Yazkan O; Ozdem C
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):679-83. PubMed ID: 18580702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results].
Solmaz MA; Yücel EA; Ozdemir M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12422082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
