These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21267627)

  • 1. On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Gottschalk K; Mardin CY; Pangeni G; Jünemann AG; Kremers J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 21267627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
    Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.
    Colotto A; Falsini B; Salgarello T; Iarossi G; Galan ME; Scullica L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 10892864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.
    Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1124-36. PubMed ID: 10235545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG.
    Rangaswamy NV; Shirato S; Kaneko M; Digby BI; Robson JG; Frishman LJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4818-28. PubMed ID: 17898309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.
    Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Walters JW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 11157891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma.
    Preiser D; Lagrèze WA; Bach M; Poloschek CM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1182-91. PubMed ID: 23307968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects.
    Wakili N; Horn FK; Jünemann AG; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Korth M; Kremers J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 117(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18273658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure lowering is associated with an increase in the photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitude in glaucoma and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Niyadurupola N; Luu CD; Nguyen DQ; Geddes K; Tan GX; Wong CC; Tran T; Coote MA; Crowston JG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 54(3):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23385794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.
    Ortiz G; Drucker D; Hyde C; Staffetti J; Kremers J; Tzekov R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31571069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms and local loss of retinal neurons in glaucoma.
    Tamada K; Machida S; Oikawa T; Miyamoto H; Nishimura T; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Feb; 35(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 20136426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The photopic negative response as a promising diagnostic tool in glaucoma. A review.
    Kiszkielis M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
    Klin Oczna; 2012; 114(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 23346804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significant correlations between photopic negative response, afferent pupillary defect, and mean defects of visual fields in asymmetric optic nerve disorders.
    Okuno T; Kida T; Ikeda T; Oku H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 258(8):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 32080769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients.
    Kremers J; Jertila M; Link B; Pangeni G; Horn FK
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 124(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 22227776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The photopic negative response (PhNR): measurement approaches and utility in glaucoma.
    Prencipe M; Perossini T; Brancoli G; Perossini M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 40(12):3565-3576. PubMed ID: 32737731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.
    Wang J; Cheng H; Hu YS; Tang RA; Frishman LJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23. PubMed ID: 22273726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between stimulus size and different components of the electroretinogram (ERG) elicited by flashed stimuli.
    Nittmann MG; Aher AJ; Kremers J; Tzekov R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):213-231. PubMed ID: 33063285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.