233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21267627)
1. On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Gottschalk K; Mardin CY; Pangeni G; Jünemann AG; Kremers J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 21267627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.
Colotto A; Falsini B; Salgarello T; Iarossi G; Galan ME; Scullica L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 10892864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.
Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1124-36. PubMed ID: 10235545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG.
Rangaswamy NV; Shirato S; Kaneko M; Digby BI; Robson JG; Frishman LJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4818-28. PubMed ID: 17898309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.
Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Walters JW
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 11157891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma.
Preiser D; Lagrèze WA; Bach M; Poloschek CM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1182-91. PubMed ID: 23307968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects.
Wakili N; Horn FK; Jünemann AG; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Korth M; Kremers J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 117(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18273658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure lowering is associated with an increase in the photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitude in glaucoma and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Niyadurupola N; Luu CD; Nguyen DQ; Geddes K; Tan GX; Wong CC; Tran T; Coote MA; Crowston JG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 54(3):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23385794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.
Ortiz G; Drucker D; Hyde C; Staffetti J; Kremers J; Tzekov R
Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31571069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms and local loss of retinal neurons in glaucoma.
Tamada K; Machida S; Oikawa T; Miyamoto H; Nishimura T; Kurosaka D
Curr Eye Res; 2010 Feb; 35(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 20136426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The photopic negative response as a promising diagnostic tool in glaucoma. A review.
Kiszkielis M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
Klin Oczna; 2012; 114(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 23346804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significant correlations between photopic negative response, afferent pupillary defect, and mean defects of visual fields in asymmetric optic nerve disorders.
Okuno T; Kida T; Ikeda T; Oku H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 258(8):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 32080769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients.
Kremers J; Jertila M; Link B; Pangeni G; Horn FK
Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 124(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 22227776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The photopic negative response (PhNR): measurement approaches and utility in glaucoma.
Prencipe M; Perossini T; Brancoli G; Perossini M
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 40(12):3565-3576. PubMed ID: 32737731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.
Wang J; Cheng H; Hu YS; Tang RA; Frishman LJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23. PubMed ID: 22273726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between stimulus size and different components of the electroretinogram (ERG) elicited by flashed stimuli.
Nittmann MG; Aher AJ; Kremers J; Tzekov R
Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):213-231. PubMed ID: 33063285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
