239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2126840)
1. Sterilization and medical treatment of the mentally disabled: some legal and ethical reflections.
Rivet M
Med Law; 1990; 9(5):1150-71. PubMed ID: 2126840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative approaches to the nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Price DP
Med Law; 1990; 9(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 2122162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities.
Knifton C
Br J Nurs; 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11; 7(19):1172-6. PubMed ID: 9866467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pediatric research and the parens patriae jurisdiction in Canada and England.
Williams RS
Med Law; 1999; 18(4):525-47. PubMed ID: 10687360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re Eve.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mentally incapable adults: consent to treatment.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1987 Jul; 2(8552):228. PubMed ID: 2885690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilisation of mentally handicapped girl authorised.
Dyer C
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6581):1219. PubMed ID: 11658872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Justice and care: mental disability and sterilization decisions.
Peppin P
Can Hum Rights Yearb; 1989-1990; 6():65-112. PubMed ID: 11659492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal power to sterilise incompetent women.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1989 Apr; 1(8642):854-5. PubMed ID: 2564947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Grady: the mentally retarded individual's right to choose sterilization.
Lachance D
Am J Law Med; 1981; 6(4):559-90. PubMed ID: 7315845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A case-based approach to sterilization of mentally incompetent women.
Keown RM
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 11657344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Re Jane.
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1988 Dec; 94():1-31. PubMed ID: 12041105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the competence of people to consent to medical treatment: a balance between law and medicine.
Hoffman BF
Med Law; 1990; 9(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 2126838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sterilization of the mentally retarded adult: the Eve case.
Starkman B
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):931-50. PubMed ID: 11650594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Terwilliger.
Pennsylvania. Superior Court
Atl Report; 1982 Sep; 450():1376-86. PubMed ID: 11648535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aftermath of the Rogers decision: assessing the costs.
Schouten R; Gutheil TG
Am J Psychiatry; 1990 Oct; 147(10):1348-52. PubMed ID: 2119147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The sterilization of women with an intellectual disability: a lawyer looks at the medical aspects.
Goldhar J
Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1991; 10(2):157-96. PubMed ID: 11659575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
Cepko R
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
