These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21268463)
61. Scaling or normalising maximum oxygen uptake to predict 1-mile run time in boys. Nevill A; Rowland T; Goff D; Martel L; Ferrone L Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 Jul; 92(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 15083364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A study to validate the modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test. Weller IM; Thomas SG; Gledhill N; Paterson D; Quinney A Can J Appl Physiol; 1995 Jun; 20(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 7640647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Health-related physical fitness is associated with selected sociodemographic and behavioral factors in Brazilian school children. Guedes DP; Miranda Neto J; Lopes VP; Silva AJ J Phys Act Health; 2012 May; 9(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 21946304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Validation of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measurements in Adolescents. Migliano P; Kabiri LS; Cross M; Butcher A; Frugé A; Brewer W; Ortiz A J Funct Morphol Kinesiol; 2019 Jul; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 33467359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Validity of Cooper's 12-min run test for estimation of maximum oxygen uptake in female university students. Bandyopadhyay A Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2014; 58(2):184-6. PubMed ID: 25509974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Reliable prediction of insulin resistance by a school-based fitness test in middle-school children. Varness T; Carrel AL; Eickhoff JC; Allen DB Int J Pediatr Endocrinol; 2009; 2009():487804. PubMed ID: 19956706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Physical working capacity and mile run performance in adolescent boys. Watkins J; Ewing BG Br J Sports Med; 1983 Sep; 17(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 6652403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. New approaches to predict VO2max and endurance from running performances. Tokmakidis SP; Léger L; Mercier D; Péronnet F; Thibault G J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1987 Dec; 27(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 3444324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Kernel Equating Under the Non-Equivalent Groups With Covariates Design. Wiberg M; Bränberg K Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):349-361. PubMed ID: 29881012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Some comments concerning the paper by McNaughton, Cooley, Kearney, Smith "A comparison of two different Shuttle Run tests for the estimation of VO2max". (J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1996;36:85-9). Léger L J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1997 Jun; 37(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 9239995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Test equating: what, why, how? Zhu W Res Q Exerc Sport; 1998 Mar; 69(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 9532618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A Comparative Evaluation of Kernel Equating and Test Characteristic Curve Equating. De Ayala RJ; Smith B; Norman Dvorak R Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):155-168. PubMed ID: 29881117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. How Important is the Choice of Bandwidth in Kernel Equating? Wallin G; Häggström J; Wiberg M Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):518-535. PubMed ID: 34866710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The comparison of the scores obtained by Bayesian nonparametric model and classical test theory methods. Yurtcu M; Kelecioglu H; Boone EL Sci Prog; 2021; 104(3):368504211028371. PubMed ID: 34236901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Equating scores using bridging stations on the clinical performance examination]. Yoo DM; Han JJ Korean J Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 25(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 25804693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]