189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21270633)
1. The value of lesser-impact-factor surgical journals as a source of negative and inconclusive outcomes reporting.
Kanaan Z; Galandiuk S; Abby M; Shannon KV; Dajani D; Hicks N; Rai SN
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 21270633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Funding source and conflict of interest disclosures by authors and editors in gastroenterology specialty journals.
Bhargava N; Qureshi J; Vakil N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jun; 102(6):1146-50. PubMed ID: 17531007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journals.
Goozner M; Caplan A; Moreno J; Kramer BS; Babor TF; Husser WC
Addiction; 2009 Nov; 104(11):1779-84. PubMed ID: 19832777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The roles of funding source, clinical trial outcome, and quality of reporting in orthopedic surgery literature.
Khan SN; Mermer MJ; Myers E; Sandhu HS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Dec; 37(12):E205-12; discussion E212. PubMed ID: 19212579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.
Brown A; Kraft D; Schmitz SM; Sharpless V; Martin C; Shah R; Shaheen NJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 4(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17101295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency, nature, effects, and correlates of conflicts of interest in published clinical cancer research.
Jagsi R; Sheets N; Jankovic A; Motomura AR; Amarnath S; Ubel PA
Cancer; 2009 Jun; 115(12):2783-91. PubMed ID: 19434666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years.
Buchkowsky SS; Jewesson PJ
Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Apr; 38(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 14982982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revealing the faults in medical journals.
Liesegang TJ
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19333735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.
Bartus CL; Katz KA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.
Luty J; Arokiadass SM; Easow JM; Anapreddy JR
J Med Ethics; 2009 Mar; 35(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 19251974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
Jones AW
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The medical literature stands to gain from critical appraisal. Commercialism and non-contextualized results under scrutiny].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5172-5. PubMed ID: 12572312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic research.
Leopold SS; Warme WJ; Fritz Braunlich E; Shott S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Oct; (415):293-301. PubMed ID: 14612659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.
Bhandari M; Busse JW; Jackowski D; Montori VM; Schünemann H; Sprague S; Mears D; Schemitsch EH; Heels-Ansdell D; Devereaux PJ
CMAJ; 2004 Feb; 170(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 14970094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Citations to trials of nicotine replacement therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact-factor journals.
Etter JF; Stapleton J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):831-7. PubMed ID: 19128941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative results and impact factor: a lesson from neonatology.
Littner Y; Mimouni FB; Dollberg S; Mandel D
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Nov; 159(11):1036-7. PubMed ID: 16275793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancy between results and abstract conclusions in industry- vs nonindustry-funded studies comparing topical prostaglandins.
Alasbali T; Smith M; Geffen N; Trope GE; Flanagan JG; Jin Y; Buys YM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):33-38.e2. PubMed ID: 18760766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
