113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21271102)
1. Cochlear implant: correlation of nerve function recovery, auditory deprivation and etiology.
Kutscher K; Goffi-Gomez MV; Befi-Lopes DM; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 21271102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Laurello SA
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective measurements of auditory nerve recovery function in nucleus CI 24 implantees in relation to subjective preference of stimulation rate.
Shpak T; Berlin M; Luntz M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jun; 124(5):582-6. PubMed ID: 15267176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is There Any Correlation between Spread of Excitation Width and the Refractory Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Users?
Coutinho da Silva J; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV; Tsuji RK; Bento R; Brito Neto R
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 32998132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in cochlear implant recipients.
Tabibi S; Kegel A; Lai WK; Bruce IC; Dillier N
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():187-196. PubMed ID: 31325737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance.
van Eijl RH; Buitenhuis PJ; Stegeman I; Klis SF; Grolman W
Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):476-487. PubMed ID: 27804133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant.
Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovery function of electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children with auditory neuropathy: preliminary results.
Kim JR; Kim LS; Jeong SW; Kim JS; Chung SH
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Aug; 131(8):796-801. PubMed ID: 21466261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
Xi X; Ji F; Han DY; Huang DL; Hong MD; Yang WY
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
