These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21271334)

  • 1. Mechanical strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implants.
    Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Hsu KR; Wang HC; Chen CM
    Odontology; 2011 Jan; 99(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 21271334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Horizontal and vertical resistance strength of infrazygomatic mini-implants.
    Wu JH; Lu PC; Lee KT; Du JK; Wang HC; Chen CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 40(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 21333495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Horizontal pull-out strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implant: an in vitro study.
    Chen CM; Wu JH; Lu PC; Wang HC; Lee HE; Wang CH; Du JK
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21448023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of mechanical strengths of three types of mini-implants in artificial bones.
    Tseng YC; Wu JH; Ting CC; Chen HS; Chen CM
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 33(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 28137418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region.
    Uribe F; Mehr R; Mathur A; Janakiraman N; Allareddy V
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():31. PubMed ID: 26373730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of fracture torque resistance of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Dalla Rosa F; Burmann PF; Ruschel HC; Vargas IA; Kramer PF
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2016 Dec; 29(3):248-254. PubMed ID: 28383605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of placement angle, diameter, length and bone density on the pull-out strength of orthodontic mini-implants: An in vitro study.
    Mohan S; Srinivasan D; Arumugam E; Devasahayam D; Kannan R
    J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 34666551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Smith A; Hosein YK; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24869900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Assad-Loss TF; Kitahara-Céia FMF; Silveira GS; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):47-54. PubMed ID: 28746487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of size and insertion angle of orthodontic mini-implants on skeletal anchorage.
    Tatli U; Alraawi M; Toroğlu MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 31375232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Orthodontic Mini-implants in the Transmucosal Profile Region.
    de Aguiar AM; Bramante FS; de Aguiar AM; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):372-5. PubMed ID: 26162256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Tung YY; Chiang YY; Lai EH; Chen WP; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 22381488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Micrographic study and torsional strength of grade 23 titanium mini-implants recycled for orthodontic purposes.
    Kaci N; Hakem K; Laraba S; Benrekaa N; Le Gall M
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 29628423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 22167023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs.
    da Cunha AC; Marquezan M; Lima I; Lopes RT; Nojima LI; Sant'Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 19705930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hard and soft tissue considerations at mini-implant insertion sites.
    Baumgaertel S
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S3-7. PubMed ID: 25138363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.