435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21271462)
1. Neural evidence for "intuitive prosecution": the use of mental state information for negative moral verdicts.
Young L; Scholz J; Saxe R
Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(3):302-15. PubMed ID: 21271462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment.
Young L; Saxe R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18823250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment.
Young L; Saxe R
Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1912-20. PubMed ID: 18342544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Innocent intentions: a correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity.
Young L; Saxe R
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2065-72. PubMed ID: 19467357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction.
Sellaro R; Güroǧlu B; Nitsche MA; van den Wildenberg WP; Massaro V; Durieux J; Hommel B; Colzato LS
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():400-8. PubMed ID: 26375450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What gets the attention of the temporo-parietal junction? An fMRI investigation of attention and theory of mind.
Young L; Dodell-Feder D; Saxe R
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2658-64. PubMed ID: 20470808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.
Chakroff A; Dungan J; Koster-Hale J; Brown A; Saxe R; Young L
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 11(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 26628642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural correlates of the judgment of lying: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Harada T; Itakura S; Xu F; Lee K; Nakashita S; Saito DN; Sadato N
Neurosci Res; 2009 Jan; 63(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18992288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional activity of the right temporo-parietal junction and of the medial prefrontal cortex associated with true and false belief reasoning.
Döhnel K; Schuwerk T; Meinhardt J; Sodian B; Hajak G; Sommer M
Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1652-61. PubMed ID: 22300812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions.
Koster-Hale J; Saxe R; Dungan J; Young LL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Apr; 110(14):5648-53. PubMed ID: 23479657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
Young L; Saxe R
Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of intent-based moral judgment.
Cushman F; Sheketoff R; Wharton S; Carey S
Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):6-21. PubMed ID: 23318350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. It is the outcome that counts! Damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex disrupts the integration of outcome and belief information for moral judgment.
Ciaramelli E; Braghittoni D; di Pellegrino G
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Nov; 18(6):962-71. PubMed ID: 22929298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Common and distinct neural networks for false-belief reasoning and inhibitory control.
Rothmayr C; Sodian B; Hajak G; Döhnel K; Meinhardt J; Sommer M
Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1705-13. PubMed ID: 21195194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal Dynamics of the Integration of Intention and Outcome in Harmful and Helpful Moral Judgment.
Gan T; Lu X; Li W; Gui D; Tang H; Mai X; Liu C; Luo YJ
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2022. PubMed ID: 26793144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network.
Reniers RL; Corcoran R; Völlm BA; Mashru A; Howard R; Liddle PF
Biol Psychol; 2012 Jul; 90(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 22459338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmental frontal lobe imaging in moral judgment: Arthur Benton's enduring influence 60 years later.
Eslinger PJ; Robinson-Long M; Realmuto J; Moll J; deOliveira-Souza R; Tovar-Moll F; Wang J; Yang QX
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 31(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 19048446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual differences in moral judgment competence are related to activity of the prefrontal cortex when attributing blame to evil intention.
Li X; Yang J; Li P; Li H
Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 26569419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction.
Saxe R; Wexler A
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(10):1391-9. PubMed ID: 15936784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment.
Cushman F
Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):353-80. PubMed ID: 18439575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
