164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21272199)
1. Influence of sex on the accuracy of oscillometric-derived blood pressures.
Bhatt SD; Hinderliter AL; Stouffer GA
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2011 Feb; 13(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 21272199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preliminary evaluation of the mean arterial pressure as measured by cuff oscillometry.
Smulyan H; Sheehe PR; Safar ME
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Feb; 21(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 18174881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of central blood pressure levels on the relationship between oscillometric and central blood pressure measurements: a multicenter invasive study.
Alihanoglu YI; Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Sizer M; Ozhan H; Koc F; Bodur S
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Sep; 15(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 24034662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive estimates of aortic root pressures: external subclavian arterial pulse tracing calibrated by oscillometrically determined brachial arterial pressures.
Aakhus S; Torp H; Haugland T; Hatle L
Clin Physiol; 1993 Nov; 13(6):573-86. PubMed ID: 8119052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central.
Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23382326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the N-point moving average method for brachial pressure waveform-derived estimation of central aortic systolic pressure.
Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
Hypertension; 2014 Apr; 63(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 24420554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements.
Borow KM; Newburger JW
Am Heart J; 1982 May; 103(5):879-86. PubMed ID: 7072592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of oscillometric and intraarterial systolic and diastolic blood pressures in lean, overweight, and obese patients.
Umana E; Ahmed W; Fraley MA; Alpert MA
Angiology; 2006; 57(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 16444455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurements.
Ochiai H; Miyazaki N; Miyata T; Mitake A; Tochikubo O; Ishii M
Jpn Heart J; 1997 May; 38(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 9290574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.
Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An initial step towards improving the accuracy of the oscillometric blood pressure measurement.
Liu J; Hahn JO; Mukkamala R
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4082-5. PubMed ID: 24110629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive determination of instantaneous brachial blood flow using the oscillometric method.
Liu SH; Wang JJ; Cheng DC
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Aug; 54(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 19807282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How important is the recommended slow cuff pressure deflation rate for blood pressure measurement?
Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2584-91. PubMed ID: 21735319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limitations of the of the oscillometric method for blood pressure measurements in dialyzed patients.
Czarkowski M; Staszkow M; Kostyra K; Shebani Z; Rozanowski K; Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J; Niemczyk S
Med Sci Monit; 2011 Apr; 17(4):MT35-40. PubMed ID: 21455115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different presentations of oscillometric data on automatic determination of systolic and diastolic pressures.
Jazbinsek V; Luznik J; Mieke S; Trontelj Z
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 38(3):774-87. PubMed ID: 19953320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
