102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21272980)
1. Biomechanical analysis of the strength of the mandible after marginal resection.
Murakami K; Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Kawakami M; Kang YB; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jun; 69(6):1798-806. PubMed ID: 21272980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Finite element analysis of the biomechanics of human mandible in response to impact force].
Liu Y; Li JY; Zhao WD
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Jan; 28(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 18227031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Validating a loading protocol for weakened mandibular models].
Yachouh J; Frison L; Goudot P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010 Jun; 111(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 20347462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical stress in symphyseal fractured human mandible reduced with miniplates during mastication.
Wang H; Ji B; Jiang W; Liu L; Zhang P; Tang W; Tian W; Fan Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1585-92. PubMed ID: 20434254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical efficacy of preventive measures for pathologic fracture after surgical removal of mandibular lesions based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Murakami K; Yamamoto K; Tsuyuki M; Sugiura T; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):833.e1-18. PubMed ID: 24635857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite-element-analysis of different screw-diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
Maurer P; Holweg S; Schubert J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):365-72. PubMed ID: 10870755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of the human mandible to assess the effect of removing an impacted third molar.
Szucs A; Bujtár P; Sándor GK; Barabás J
J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a72. PubMed ID: 20579440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The comparison of angular and curvilinear marginal mandibulectomy on force distribution with three dimensional finite element analysis.
Ertem SY; Uckan S; Ozden UA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):e54-8. PubMed ID: 22890086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical response of a mandible in a patient affected with hemifacial microsomia before and after distraction osteogenesis.
Reina-Romo E; Sampietro-Fuentes A; Gómez-Benito MJ; Domínguez J; Doblaré M; García-Aznar JM
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Oct; 32(8):860-6. PubMed ID: 20594898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A three-dimensional computer model of the human mandible in two simulated standard trauma situations.
Gallas Torreira M; Fernandez JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 32(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 15458672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical analysis of titanium miniplates used for treatment of mandibular symphyseal fractures with the finite element method.
Ji B; Wang C; Liu L; Long J; Tian W; Wang H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e21-7. PubMed ID: 20219581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Standard measurements, elasticity values and tensile strength behavior of the human mandible, a contribution to the biomechanics of the mandible--I].
Arendts FJ; Sigolotto C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989 Oct; 34(10):248-55. PubMed ID: 2819111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of implant placement in the reconstructed mandible.
Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Kawana H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 20162103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis comparing natural and alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using a finite element model.
Mesnard M; Ramos A; Ballu A; Morlier J; Cid M; Simoes JA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1008-17. PubMed ID: 20674129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Experimental and finite-element models for the assessment of mandibular deformation under mechanical loading].
Meyer U; Vollmer D; Homann C; Schuon R; Benthaus S; Végh A; Felszegi E; Joos U; Piffkò J
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jan; 4(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10662914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular fractures.
Lovald ST; Wagner JD; Baack B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 May; 67(5):973-85. PubMed ID: 19375006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
