189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21273079)
1. Detection of infundibula using three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with volume rendering at 3.0 Tesla compared to digital subtraction angiography.
Sun ZK; Li YD; Li MH; Chen SW; Tan HQ
J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 18(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 21273079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
Li MH; Li YD; Tan HQ; Gu BX; Chen YC; Wang W; Chen SW; Hu DJ
Neurology; 2011 Aug; 77(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 21775735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience.
Mönninghoff C; Maderwald S; Theysohn JM; Kraff O; Ladd SC; Ladd ME; Forsting M; Quick HH; Wanke I
Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19115164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study.
Kittner T; Rudolf J; Fages JF; Legmann P; Aschauer M; Repa I; Alvares MR; Savalegui I; Ittrich H; Geterud K; de Kevviler E; Ayuso J; Lockhart ME; Blum A; Iliasch H; Leisinger G; van Beek EJ; Reid AW; Brown JJ; Yu TC; Flamm SD; Düber C; Judmaier W; Reimer P; Stiskal M; Kramann B; Wolff S; Blankenstein C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 17412546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils.
Ferré JC; Carsin-Nicol B; Morandi X; Carsin M; de Kersaint-Gilly A; Gauvrit JY; Desal HA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 18809272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [MRA volume rendering for surgical planning of unruptured intracranial cerebral aneurysms].
Narisawa A; Syamoto H; Karibe H; Shimizu H; Fujiwara S; Tominaga T
No Shinkei Geka; 2005 Mar; 33(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 15773313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Depiction of branch vessels arising from intracranial aneurysm sacs: Time-of-flight MR angiography versus CT angiography.
Goto M; Kunimatsu A; Shojima M; Mori H; Abe O; Aoki S; Hayashi N; Gonoi W; Miyati T; Ino K; Yano K; Saito N; Ohtomo K
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 126():177-84. PubMed ID: 25270230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries].
Carriero A; Gatta S; Baratto M; Marano R; Aulisa R; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 9638159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Cirillo M; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Kirchin MA; Scotti G
Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):559-67. PubMed ID: 18648255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography.
Shahzad R; Younas F
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jun; 21(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 21711985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-resolution steady state magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: are intravascular agents necessary?: feasibility and preliminary experience with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Kirchin MA; Neira C; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Dec; 44(12):784-92. PubMed ID: 19858728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow up of coiled intracranial aneurysms with standard resolution and higher resolution magnetic resonance angiography.
Dupre S; Coulthard A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18373828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms.
Okahara M; Kiyosue H; Yamashita M; Nagatomi H; Hata H; Saginoya T; Sagara Y; Mori H
Stroke; 2002 Jul; 33(7):1803-8. PubMed ID: 12105357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
