These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21273113)

  • 1. Assessment and stenting of tracheal stenosis using deformable shape models.
    Pinho R; Tournoy KG; Sijbers J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Apr; 15(2):250-66. PubMed ID: 21273113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated finite-element analysis for deformable registration of prostate images.
    Crouch JR; Pizer SM; Chaney EL; Hu YC; Mageras GS; Zaider M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1379-90. PubMed ID: 17948728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physically-based validation of deformable medical image registration.
    Lee HP; Lin MC; Foskey M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):830-8. PubMed ID: 18982682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D/2D image registration: the impact of X-ray views and their number.
    Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 1):450-7. PubMed ID: 18051090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deformable 2D-3D registration of the pelvis with a limited field of view, using shape statistics.
    Sadowsky O; Chintalapani G; Taylor RH
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):519-26. PubMed ID: 18044608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ray-tracing based registration for HRCT images of the lungs.
    Busayara S; Zrimec T
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):670-7. PubMed ID: 17354830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic construction of parts+geometry models for initializing groupwise registration.
    Zhang P; Cootes TF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 21947520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy.
    Zhong H; Peters T; Siebers JV
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4721-38. PubMed ID: 17671331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Segmenting lung fields in serial chest radiographs using both population-based and patient-specific shape statistics.
    Shi Y; Qi F; Xue Z; Chen L; Ito K; Matsuo H; Shen D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Apr; 27(4):481-94. PubMed ID: 18390345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A classifying registration technique for the estimation of enhancement curves of DCE-CT scan sequences.
    Hachama M; Desolneux A; Cuenod CA; Richard FJ
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 20061177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DIRBoost-an algorithm for boosting deformable image registration: application to lung CT intra-subject registration.
    Muenzing SE; van Ginneken B; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
    Med Image Anal; 2014 Apr; 18(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 24556079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atlas-based automated segmentation of spleen and liver using adaptive enhancement estimation.
    Linguraru MG; Sandberg JK; Li Z; Pura JA; Summers RM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):1001-8. PubMed ID: 20426209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust deformable image registration using prior shape information for atlas to patient registration.
    Ellingsen LM; Chintalapani G; Taylor RH; Prince JL
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jan; 34(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 19515532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined model-based segmentation and elastic registration for accurate quantification of the aortic arch.
    Biesdorf A; Rohr K; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Wörz S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2010; 13(Pt 1):444-51. PubMed ID: 20879261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully automated 2D-3D registration and verification.
    Varnavas A; Carrell T; Penney G
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Dec; 26(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 26387052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.
    Zhong H; Kim J; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):970-9. PubMed ID: 20384233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stochastic resonance-based tomographic transform for computed tomographic image enhancement of brain lesions.
    Rallabandi VP; Roy PK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):966-74. PubMed ID: 19204462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A homotopy-based sparse representation for fast and accurate shape prior modeling in liver surgical planning.
    Wang G; Zhang S; Xie H; Metaxas DN; Gu L
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Jan; 19(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 25461336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An improved 3D shape context based non-rigid registration method and its application to small animal skeletons registration.
    Xiao D; Zahra D; Bourgeat P; Berghofer P; Tamayo OA; Wimberley C; Gregoire MC; Salvado O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 20044235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated 3-D PDM construction from segmented images using deformable models.
    Kaus MR; Pekar V; Lorenz C; Truyen R; Lobregt S; Weese J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1005-13. PubMed ID: 12906254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.