249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21274732)
1. Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage.
de Lima Araújo LH; Zenóbio EG; Pacheco W; Cosso MG; Manzi FR; Shibli JA
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 16(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 21274732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion.
Liu YH; Ding WH; Liu J; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 36(9):687-95. PubMed ID: 19602104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.
Nagaraj K; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 18575310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrusion of Lower Incisors in Deep Overbite Cases with Mini-screws.
Alaa-Eldin AM; Salem AS; Fouda MA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27319038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class I malocclusion with severe double protrusion treated with first premolars extraction.
Moresca R
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):127-38. PubMed ID: 25162577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The retraction of upper incisors with the PG retraction system.
Dinçer M; Gülşen A; Türk T
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Feb; 22(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10721243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes.
Kuroda S; Yamada K; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19268827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
