254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21275573)
1. Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Reades R; Studnek JR; Garrett JS; Vandeventer S; Blackwell T
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 21275573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.
Reades R; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S; Garrett J
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 58(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 21856044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Wampler D; Schwartz D; Shumaker J; Bolleter S; Beckett R; Manifold C
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 30(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 22030185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The association of tibial vs. humeral intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
Brebner C; Asamoah-Boaheng M; Zaidel B; Yap J; Scheuermeyer F; Mok V; Christian M; Kawano T; Singh L; van Diepen S; Christenson J; Grunau B
Resuscitation; 2023 Dec; 193():110031. PubMed ID: 37923113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO.
Ong MEH; Chan YH; Oh JJ; Ngo AS
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jan; 27(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19041528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of success rate and access time for an adult sternal intraosseous device deployed in the prehospital setting.
Byars DV; Tsuchitani SN; Erwin E; Anglemyer B; Eastman J
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2011 Apr; 26(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature.
Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M
Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.
Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study.
Gendron B; Cronin A; Monti J; Brigg A
Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraosseous infusion rates under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites.
Pasley J; Miller CH; DuBose JJ; Shackelford SA; Fang R; Boswell K; Halcome C; Casey J; Cotter M; Matsuura M; Relph N; Tarmey NT; Stein DM
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Feb; 78(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 25757113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distal femur versus humeral or tibial IO, access in adult out of hospital cardiac resuscitation.
Rayas EG; Winckler C; Bolleter S; Stringfellow M; Miramontes D; Shumaker J; Lewis A; Wampler D
Resuscitation; 2022 Jan; 170():11-16. PubMed ID: 34748766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest].
Virkkunen I; Hoppu S; Kämäräinen A
Duodecim; 2011; 127(21):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22204143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmacokinetics of intraosseous and central venous drug delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Hoskins SL; do Nascimento P; Lima RM; Espana-Tenorio JM; Kramer GC
Resuscitation; 2012 Jan; 83(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 21871857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraosseous devices for intravascular access in adult trauma patients.
Day MW
Crit Care Nurse; 2011 Apr; 31(2):76-89; quiz 90. PubMed ID: 21459867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service.
Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V
J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study.
Hammer N; Möbius R; Gries A; Hossfeld B; Bechmann I; Bernhard M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective analysis of intraosseous versus intravenous access.
Ross EM; Mapp J; Kharod C; Wampler DA; Velasquez C; Miramontes DA
Am J Disaster Med; 2016; 11(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 28102532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the pediatric EZ-IO needle by emergency medical services providers.
Frascone RJ; Jensen J; Wewerka SS; Salzman JG
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2009 May; 25(5):329-32. PubMed ID: 19404222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a battery-operated needle driver for intraosseous access by novice users: skill acquisition with cadavers.
Levitan RM; Bortle CD; Snyder TA; Nitsch DA; Pisaturo JT; Butler KH
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 54(5):692-4. PubMed ID: 19643511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of proximal tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model.
Lairet J; Bebarta V; Lairet K; Kacprowicz R; Lawler C; Pitotti R; Bush A; King J
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 23331182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
