BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21276020)

  • 1. Influence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities.
    ElAyouti A; Serry MI; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2011 Jun; 44(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 21276020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth.
    Akman S; Akman M; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 21219366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
    Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new approach to endodontic treatment and operative procedure in nonendodontically treated posterior crown root fractures.
    González-López S; González-Villafranca MP; Bolaños-Carmona MV; Menéndez-Nuñez M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):e106-10. PubMed ID: 19734070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Resistance of cavity walls of composite filled teeth].
    Fabianelli A; De Luca S; Garberoglio R
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(13):94-100, 103-4. PubMed ID: 1824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials.
    Oliveira Fde C; Denehy GE; Boyer DB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Jul; 115(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 3475370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
    Trope M; Tronstad L
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
    Ausiello P; De Gee AJ; Rengo S; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.
    Oskoee PA; Ajami AA; Navimipour EJ; Oskoee SS; Sadjadi J
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 19249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.