These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21276020)

  • 21. In vitro fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars.
    Steele A; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 1999 Jan; 25(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10196835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin.
    Ehrnford LE; Fransson H
    Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 7871480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices.
    Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Roeters FJ; Creugers NH; Burgersdijk RC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 12475162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Ishikiriama SK; de Oliveira Filho O; Mondelli J
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 19466244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration.
    Lee MR; Cho BH; Son HH; Um CM; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 16530819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars.
    Trope M; Langer I; Maltz D; Tronstad L
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1986 Feb; 2(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 3457699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.
    Fennis WM; Tezvergil A; Kuijs RH; Lassila LV; Kreulen CM; Creugers NH; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 15904700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impression matrix technique for cusp replacement using direct composite resin.
    Denehy G; Cobb D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(4):227-33; discussion 234. PubMed ID: 15672615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars.
    Soares CJ; Soares PV; de Freitas Santos-Filho PC; Castro CG; Magalhaes D; Versluis A
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1015-9. PubMed ID: 18634938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Resin composite polyethylene fiber reinforcement: effect on fracture resistance of weakened marginal ridges.
    Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 20718208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
    Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.
    Nothdurft FP; Seidel E; Gebhart F; Naumann M; Motter PJ; Pospiech PR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18430506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.