These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21276506)

  • 1. Regarding "Inherent problems with randomized clinical trials with observational/no treatment arms".
    Lederle FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 53(2):561; author reply 561-2. PubMed ID: 21276506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inherent problems with randomized clinical trials with observational/no treatment arms.
    Buckley CJ; Rutherford RB; Diethrich EB; Buckley SD
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 52(1):237-41. PubMed ID: 20620768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of study design on outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A comparison between the randomized controlled DREAM-trial and the observational EUROSTAR-registry.
    Leurs LJ; Buth J; Harris PL; Blankensteijn JD
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 17097901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analysis of randomized and risk-adjusted observational studies of endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Takagi H; Umemoto T
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2011 Nov; 45(8):717-9. PubMed ID: 22262115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Open and endovascular surgery for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Review of the available evidence].
    Mariné M L; Valdés E F; Mertens M R; Krämer Sch A; Bergoeing R M; Rivera D D; Vergara G J; Carvajal N C
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Aug; 137(8):1081-8. PubMed ID: 19915774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: time for action.
    Ricco JB
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(6):607. PubMed ID: 16968666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commentary on "endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair versus open repair: why and why not?".
    Jacobs DL; Upchurch GR
    Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther; 2009 Mar; 21(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 19380394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part one: for the motion: A randomised controlled trial is the best way to determine whether endovascular repair is the preferred management strategy in patients with a ruptured aortic aneurysm.
    Powell JT; Hinchliffe RJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 40(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 20719548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Letter to editor re: "comparison of mortality prediction models after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair".
    Tang TY; Walsh SR; Boyle JR
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):379. PubMed ID: 17574452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Part two: against the motion: It is not necessary to perform a randomised trial to compare open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Veith FJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 40(4):424-7. PubMed ID: 20655772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Routine treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: surely, results from randomized studies should be applied, but...].
    Lundgren F
    Lakartidningen; 2010 Dec 15-21; 107(50):3225-6; discussion 3226. PubMed ID: 21294340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trans-Atlantic debate: Is a randomised trial necessary to determine whether endovascular repair is the preferred management strategy in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms?
    Ricco JB; Forbes TL
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 40(4):427-8. PubMed ID: 20797883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of the results of OVER in the context of EVAR trial, DREAM, and the EUROSTAR registry.
    Malas MB; Freischlag JA
    Semin Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 23(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 20826293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High risk and unfit for open repair are not the same.
    Greenhalgh RM; Brown LC; Powell JT
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 34(2):154-5. PubMed ID: 17574879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized study comparing cardiac response in endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Rittoo D
    Br J Surg; 2002 Mar; 89(3):370; author reply 370. PubMed ID: 11905425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The PIVOTAL study: a randomized comparison of endovascular repair versus surveillance in patients with smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Ouriel K
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Jan; 49(1):266-9. PubMed ID: 19174266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endovascular infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Davis M; Taylor PR
    Heart; 2008 Feb; 94(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 18195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: evidence-based treatment must be based on generally accessible information].
    Lundgren F
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Jan 23-29; 105(4):231-2. PubMed ID: 18306829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discussion of paper by Korn and Freidlin.
    Wittes J
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Mar; 11(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 21400376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re-defining outcome measurements in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: mortality rates are just not enough.
    Liapis CD; Avgerinos ED
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):494-5. PubMed ID: 18466825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.