These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21276530)

  • 1. Invited commentary.
    Greenberg CC; Zinner MJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Feb; 212(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 21276530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical evaluation of the impact of Leapfrog's evidence-based hospital referral.
    Massarweh NN; Flum DR; Symons RG; Varghese TK; Pellegrini CA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Feb; 212(2):150-159.e1. PubMed ID: 21193332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.
    Birkmeyer JD; Dimick JB
    Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 15179361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Centralization harnessing volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery and aortic aneurysm care should not focus solely on threshold operative caseload.
    Karthikesalingam A; Hinchliffe RJ; Poloniecki JD; Loftus IM; Thompson MM; Holt PJ
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2010 Oct; 44(7):556-9. PubMed ID: 20675332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter re: relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review.
    Holt P
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 17574880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.
    Urbach DR; Bell CM; Austin PC
    CMAJ; 2003 May; 168(11):1409-14. PubMed ID: 12771069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-defining outcome measurements in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: mortality rates are just not enough.
    Liapis CD; Avgerinos ED
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):494-5. PubMed ID: 18466825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes and processes of care related to preoperative medical consultation.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Beattie WS; Hux JE; Laupacis A
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 Aug; 170(15):1365-74. PubMed ID: 20696963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals.
    Eckstein HH; Bruckner T; Heider P; Wolf O; Hanke M; Niedermeier HP; Noppeney T; Umscheid T; Wenk H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 17601754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving surgical outcomes through adoption of evidence-based process measures: intervention specific or associated with overall hospital quality?
    Brooke BS; Meguid RA; Makary MA; Perler BA; Pronovost PJ; Pawlik TM
    Surgery; 2010 Apr; 147(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 20004443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stat bite: Effect of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 May; 95(10):701. PubMed ID: 12759380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small rural hospitals and high-risk operations: how would regionalization affect surgical volume and hospital revenue?
    Chappel AR; Zuckerman RS; Finlayson SR
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 17084319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviews.
    Pieper D; Mathes T; Neugebauer E; Eikermann M
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 May; 216(5):1015-1025.e18. PubMed ID: 23528183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invited commentary: Measurement of quality in surgery: that's our job.
    Bass BL
    Surgery; 2004 Jun; 135(6):576-8. PubMed ID: 15179362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Centralisation: putting patients first.
    Holt P; Thompson MM
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):580-1. PubMed ID: 20851646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of the link between surgical outcomes and volume: how we got to "Leapfrog".
    Babineau TJ
    Curr Surg; 2004; 61(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 14972163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volume- or outcome-based referral to improve quality of care for esophageal cancer surgery in The Netherlands.
    Wouters MW; Krijnen P; Le Cessie S; Gooiker GA; Guicherit OR; Marinelli AW; Kievit J; Tollenaar RA
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):481-7. PubMed ID: 19466737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between in-hospital mortality in New York State and the volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries performed.
    Hannan EL; Kilburn H; O'Donnell JF; Bernard HR; Shields EP; Lindsey ML; Yazici A
    Health Serv Res; 1992 Oct; 27(4):517-42. PubMed ID: 1399655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolving importance of readmission data to the practicing surgeon.
    Brown RE; Qadan M; Martin RC; Polk HC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Oct; 211(4):558-60. PubMed ID: 20729104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.