74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21276839)
1. Dynamics of choice during estimation of subjective value.
Robles E; Roberts NA; Sanabria F
Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 21276839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict.
Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; De Baene W; Verguts T; Notebaert W
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An alertness decrement hypothesis of response inhibition to repeatedly presented stimuli.
Cecil LS; Kraut AG; Smothergill DW
Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 6496810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An automatic valuation system in the human brain: evidence from functional neuroimaging.
Lebreton M; Jorge S; Michel V; Thirion B; Pessiglione M
Neuron; 2009 Nov; 64(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 19914190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive impulsivity in animal models: role of response time and reinforcing rate in delay intolerance with two-choice operant tasks.
Adriani W; Zoratto F; Romano E; Laviola G
Neuropharmacology; 2010; 58(4-5):694-701. PubMed ID: 19945469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A choice reaction-time task in the rat: a new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses.
Kaneko H; Tamura H; Kawashima T; Suzuki SS
Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 174(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 16934882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.
Yeung N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 20192535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential effects on speeded information processing: a developmental study.
Smulders SF; Notebaert W; Meijer M; Crone EA; van der Molen MW; Soetens E
J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(3):208-34. PubMed ID: 15707860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching.
Arrington CM; Weaver SM; Pauker RL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 20565222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of variations in force on fractionated reaction time in simple and choice conditions.
Ito M
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Oct; 71(2):595-602. PubMed ID: 2251092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute aerobic exercise and information processing: energizing motor processes during a choice reaction time task.
Audiffren M; Tomporowski PD; Zagrodnik J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):410-9. PubMed ID: 18930445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Dibutyl Phthalate (CAS No. 84-74-2) Administered in Feed to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
Marsman D
Toxic Rep Ser; 1995 Apr; 30():1-G5. PubMed ID: 12209194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
Stahl J; Gibbons H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motor components in the choice reaction time of mildly retarded adults.
Brewer N
Am J Ment Defic; 1978 May; 82(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fractionated simple and choice reaction time in children with prenatal exposure to alcohol.
Simmons RW; Wass T; Thomas JD; Riley EP
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Sep; 26(9):1412-9. PubMed ID: 12351937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The locus of focus: the effect of switching from a preferred to a non-preferred focus of attention.
Weiss SM; Reber AS; Owen DR
J Sports Sci; 2008 Aug; 26(10):1049-57. PubMed ID: 18608831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Keeping Simon simple: examining the relationship between sequential modulations and feature repetitions with two stimuli, two locations and two responses.
Hazeltine E; Akçay C; Mordkoff JT
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 20708162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
