These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21276887)

  • 1. The comparative stability of screw versus plate versus screw and plate coronoid fixation.
    Budoff JE; Meyers DN; Ambrose CG
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Feb; 36(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 21276887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary on "biomechanical properties of volar hybrid and locked plate fixation in distal radius fractures".
    Toby EB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 36(4):598. PubMed ID: 21463724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical properties of volar hybrid and locked plate fixation in distal radius fractures.
    Sokol SC; Amanatullah DF; Curtiss S; Szabo RM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 36(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 21463723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the helical plate for bone fracture fixation.
    Krishna KR; Sridhar I; Ghista DN
    Injury; 2008 Dec; 39(12):1421-36. PubMed ID: 18823624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Evaluation of Plate Versus Lag Screw Only Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.
    Misaghi A; Doan J; Bastrom T; Pennock AT
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(5):896-9. PubMed ID: 25990534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
    Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixation of Anteromedial Coronoid Facet Fractures: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Plated Versus Screw Constructs.
    Morellato J; Louati H; Desloges W; Papp S; Pollock JW
    J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Nov; 32(11):e451-e456. PubMed ID: 30339648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical comparison of short segment long bone fracture fixation techniques: single large fragment plate versus 2 small fragment plates.
    Watts A; Weinhold P; Kesler W; Dahners L
    J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Sep; 26(9):528-32. PubMed ID: 22377506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the mechanical properties of locking plates with and without screw hole inserts.
    Eichinger JK; Herzog JP; Arrington ED
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):19. PubMed ID: 21210620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques.
    Blair B; Koval KJ; Kummer F; Zuckerman JD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):256-63. PubMed ID: 8070205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
    Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of conventional technique versus oblique screw placement in plate fixation.
    Karadeniz E; Balcik BC; Demirors H; Tuncay IC
    J Trauma; 2011 May; 70(5):E84-7. PubMed ID: 21610415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of tension band- and interfragmentary screw fixation with a new implant in transverse patella fractures.
    Dargel J; Gick S; Mader K; Koebke J; Pennig D
    Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19665707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of divergent screw placement on the initial strength of plate-to-bone fixation.
    Robert KQ; Chandler R; Baratta RV; Thomas KA; Harris MB
    J Trauma; 2003 Dec; 55(6):1139-44. PubMed ID: 14676661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
    Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical Comparison of Headless Screw Fixation and Locking Plate Fixation for Talar Neck Fractures.
    Karakasli A; Hapa O; Erduran M; Dincer C; Cecen B; Havitcioglu H
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(5):905-9. PubMed ID: 25998471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model.
    Gajendran VK; Szabo RM; Myo GK; Curtiss SB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1851-8. PubMed ID: 19897325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comminuted talar neck fractures: a mechanical comparison of fixation techniques.
    Attiah M; Sanders DW; Valdivia G; Cooper I; Ferreira L; MacLeod MD; Johnson JA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 17211269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screw- versus plate-fixation strength of acetabular anterior column fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Gras F; Marintschev I; Schwarz CE; Hofmann GO; Pohlemann T; Culemann U
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1664-70. PubMed ID: 22695438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical evaluation of fracture fixation augmented with tricalcium phosphate bone cement in a porous osteoporotic cancellous bone model.
    Collinge C; Merk B; Lautenschlager EP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Feb; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17304068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.