These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21277177)

  • 1. Quantification of direct current in electrically active implants using MRI methods.
    Wojtczyk H; Graf H; Martirosian P; Ballweg V; Kraiger M; Pintaske J; Schick F
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 21277177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance visualization of conductive structures by sequence-triggered direct currents and spin-echo phase imaging.
    Eibofner F; Wojtczyk H; Graf H; Clasen S
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062301. PubMed ID: 24877833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise analysis and MR pulse sequence optimization in MREIT using an injected current nonlinear encoding (ICNE) method.
    Kwon OI; Lee BI; Nam HS; Park C
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1391-404. PubMed ID: 17978423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of AC magnetic field distribution using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ider YZ; Muftuler LT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 9368117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Hamamura MJ; Muftuler LT; Birgul O; Nalcioglu O
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2753-62. PubMed ID: 16723764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equilibrium signal intensity mapping, an MRI method for fast mapping of longitudinal relaxation rates and for image enhancement.
    Surányi P; Kiss P; Ruzsics B; Brott BC; Simor T; Elgavish GA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 17540275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast and spatial resolution in MREIT using low amplitude current.
    Birgul O; Hamamura MJ; Muftuler LT; Nalcioglu O
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):5035-49. PubMed ID: 16985286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing ferromagnetic artefact with metallic lumbar total disc arthroplasty devices at adjacent segments: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Strong G; Trewhella M; Kasis A; Friesem T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 20081522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible needles and interactive sequences for musculoskeletal interventions using an open high-field magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
    Wonneberger U; Schnackenburg B; Streitparth F; Walter T; Rump J; Teichgräber UK
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 19705200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An approach to MRI-based dosimetry for transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Hernandez-Garcia L; Lee S; Grissom W
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1171-8. PubMed ID: 17509897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjustable cerebrospinal fluid shunt valves in 3.0-Tesla MRI: a phantom study using explanted devices.
    Akbar M; Aschoff A; Georgi JC; Nennig E; Heiland S; Abel R; Stippich C
    Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 20563954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite volume analysis of temperature effects induced by active MRI implants: 2. Defects on active MRI implants causing hot spots.
    Busch MH; Vollmann W; Grönemeyer DH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16729878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative T(1)(ρ) imaging using phase cycling for B0 and B1 field inhomogeneity compensation.
    Chen W; Takahashi A; Han E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jun; 29(5):608-19. PubMed ID: 21524869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regional absolute conductivity reconstruction using projected current density in MREIT.
    Sajib SZ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(18):5841-59. PubMed ID: 22951361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.