219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21277733)
1. Comparison of completely knotless and hybrid double-row fixation systems: a biomechanical study.
Chu T; McDonald E; Tufaga M; Kandemir U; Buckley J; Ma CB
Arthroscopy; 2011 Apr; 27(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 21277733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation.
Ma CB; Comerford L; Wilson J; Puttlitz CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 88(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 16452754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.
Zheng N; Harris HW; Andrews JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 18451396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cyclic biomechanical testing of biocomposite lateral row knotless anchors in a human cadaveric model.
Barber FA; Bava ED; Spenciner DB; Piccirillo J
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 23578366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of a knotless transtendon interimplant mattress repair for partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears.
Park MC; Jun BJ; Park CJ; Oh JH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Dec; 37(12):2427-34. PubMed ID: 19940315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
Nelson CO; Sileo MJ; Grossman MG; Serra-Hsu F
Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 18657744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.
Cummins CA; Strickland S; Appleyard RC; Szomor ZL; Marshall J; Murrell GA
Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 12627147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Importance of Tear Edge Fixation in Modified Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical Study.
Roghani R; Snir N; Wolfson TS; Rokito AS
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Mar; 73(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 26516996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical variations of double-row rotator cuff fixation: the importance of medial row knots.
Busfield BT; Glousman RE; McGarry MH; Tibone JE; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2008 May; 36(5):901-6. PubMed ID: 18326033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knotless single-row rotator cuff repair: a comparative biomechanical study of 2 knotless suture anchors.
Efird C; Traub S; Baldini T; Rioux-Forker D; Spalazzi JP; Davisson T; Hawkins M; McCarty E
Orthopedics; 2013 Aug; 36(8):e1033-7. PubMed ID: 23937749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triple-Loaded Suture Anchors Versus a Knotless Rip Stop Construct in a Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Model.
Noyes MP; Lederman E; Adams CR; Denard PJ
Arthroscopy; 2018 May; 34(5):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 29456064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study.
Meier SW; Meier JD
Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1168-73. PubMed ID: 17084292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Comparison of Standard and Linked Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Human Cadaver Model.
Meisel AF; Henninger HB; Barber FA; Getelman MH
Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):938-944. PubMed ID: 28089497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?
Salata MJ; Sherman SL; Lin EC; Sershon RA; Gupta A; Shewman E; Wang VM; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 23239668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical validation of load-sharing rip-stop fixation for the repair of tissue-deficient rotator cuff tears.
Burkhart SS; Denard PJ; Konicek J; Hanypsiak BT
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):457-62. PubMed ID: 24375848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical comparison of the suture-bridge technique vs. a new transosseous technique using SutureButtons(®).
Tauber M; Hoffelner T; Penzkofer R; Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Moroder P; Resch H
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 21684053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair.
Kim DH; Elattrache NS; Tibone JE; Jun BJ; DeLaMora SN; Kvitne RS; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 34(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 16282581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
