283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21278010)
1. Microchamber setup characterization for nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure.
Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P; Wu YH; Sanders JM; Gundersen MA; Vernier PT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1656-62. PubMed ID: 21278010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Moveable wire electrode microchamber for nanosecond pulsed electric-field delivery.
Wu YH; Arnaud-Cormos D; Casciola M; Sanders JM; Leveque P; Vernier PT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Feb; 60(2):489-96. PubMed ID: 23192479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of a 50- Ω exposure setup for high-voltage nanosecond pulsed electric field bioexperiments.
Kenaan M; El Amari S; Silve A; Merla C; Mir LM; Couderc V; Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 20876001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF).
Pakhomov AG; Kolb JF; White JA; Joshi RP; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Dec; 28(8):655-63. PubMed ID: 17654532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nanosecond pulsed electric field generators for the study of subcellular effects.
Kolb JF; Kono S; Schoenbach KH
Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Apr; 27(3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16304697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A microfluidic biochip for the nanoporation of living cells.
Dalmay C; Villemejane J; Joubert V; Silve A; Arnaud-Cormos D; Français O; Mir LM; Leveque P; Le Pioufle B
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Aug; 26(12):4649-55. PubMed ID: 21715154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells.
Beebe SJ; Fox PM; Rec LJ; Willis EL; Schoenbach KH
FASEB J; 2003 Aug; 17(11):1493-5. PubMed ID: 12824299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Pulse Repetition Rate in nsPEF-Induced Electroporation: A Biological and Numerical Investigation.
Lamberti P; Romeo S; Sannino A; Zeni L; Zeni O
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 62(9):2234-43. PubMed ID: 25850084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electroporation based on hydrodynamic focusing of microfluidics with low dc voltage.
Zhu T; Luo C; Huang J; Xiong C; Ouyang Q; Fang J
Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Feb; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19757070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plasma membrane voltage changes during nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure.
Frey W; White JA; Price RO; Blackmore PF; Joshi RP; Nuccitelli R; Beebe SJ; Schoenbach KH; Kolb JF
Biophys J; 2006 May; 90(10):3608-15. PubMed ID: 16513782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) induce direct electric field effects and biological effects on human colon carcinoma cells.
Hall EH; Schoenbach KH; Beebe SJ
DNA Cell Biol; 2005 May; 24(5):283-91. PubMed ID: 15869405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delivery devices for exposure of biological cells to nanosecond pulsed electric fields.
Soueid M; Dobbelaar MCF; Bentouati S; Bardet SM; O'Connor RP; Bessières D; Paillol J; Leveque P; Arnaud-Cormos D
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Jan; 56(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 28674780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technological and Theoretical Aspects for Testing Electroporation on Liposomes.
Denzi A; Della Valle E; Esposito G; Mir LM; Apollonio F; Liberti M
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5092704. PubMed ID: 28393078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Membrane permeabilization and cell damage by ultrashort electric field shocks.
Pakhomov AG; Shevin R; White JA; Kolb JF; Pakhomova ON; Joshi RP; Schoenbach KH
Arch Biochem Biophys; 2007 Sep; 465(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 17555703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Theoretical analysis of transmembrane potential of cells exposed to nanosecond pulsed electric field.
Lu W; Wu K; Hu X; Xie X; Ning J; Wang C; Zhou H; Yang G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 27586355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Research progress of nanosecond pulsed electric field applied to intracellular electromanipulation].
Yao C; Mo D; Sun C; Chen X; Xiong Z
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 25(5):1206-9. PubMed ID: 19024477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of the efficiency of cell membrane electroporation using pulsed ac fields.
Chen C; Evans JA; Robinson MP; Smye SW; O'Toole P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4747-57. PubMed ID: 18701769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of employing model-based optimization of pulse amplitude and electrode distance for effective tumor electropermeabilization.
Sel D; Lebar AM; Miklavcic D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 17518273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.
Vernier PT; Sun Y; Gundersen MA
BMC Cell Biol; 2006 Oct; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17052354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diverse effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on cells and tissues.
Beebe SJ; White J; Blackmore PF; Deng Y; Somers K; Schoenbach KH
DNA Cell Biol; 2003 Dec; 22(12):785-96. PubMed ID: 14683589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
