These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21278475)

  • 1. A practitioner's perspective on the uses and future developments for wastewater treatment modelling.
    Daigger GT
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 21278475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.
    Fenu A; Guglielmi G; Jimenez J; Spèrandio M; Saroj D; Lesjean B; Brepols C; Thoeye C; Nopens I
    Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of the Activated Sludge Model no. 3 for German wastewater on six different WWTPs.
    Wichern M; Lübken M; Blömer R; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):211-8. PubMed ID: 12906292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the costs of collective treatment of wastewater: the case of Walloon Region (Belgium).
    Dogot T; Xanthoulis Y; Fonder N; Xanthoulis D
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 20706011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling of full-scale wastewater treatment plants with different treatment processes using the Activated Sludge Model no. 3.
    Wichern M; Obenaus F; Wulf P; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11496677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planning of wastewater treatment and disposal systems of Istanbul metropolitan area.
    Eroglu V; Sarikaya HZ; Aydin AF
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):31-8. PubMed ID: 11547999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of public or private structures in wastewater treatment on the conditions for the design, construction and operation of wastewater treatment plants.
    Grünebaum T; Bode H
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):273-80. PubMed ID: 15553486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model-based evaluation of nitrogen removal in a tannery wastewater treatment plant.
    Moussa MS; Rojas AR; Hooijmans CM; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):251-60. PubMed ID: 15537014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrated modelling concept for immission-based management of sewer system, wastewater treatment plant and river.
    Erbe V; Schütze M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):95-103. PubMed ID: 16248185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling nitrite in wastewater treatment systems: a discussion of different modelling concepts.
    Sin G; Kaelin D; Kampschreur MJ; Takács I; Wett B; Gernaey KV; Rieger L; Siegrist H; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1155-71. PubMed ID: 18845852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards a low complexity carbon removal model for the optimal design of compact decentralised wastewater treatment systems.
    Moelants N; Smets IY; Van Den Broeck R; Lambert N; Liers S; Declerck P; Vanysacker L; Van Impe JF
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1579-88. PubMed ID: 20351438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling and simulation of the steady-state of secondary settlers in wastewater treatment plants.
    Queinnec I; Dochain D
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):39-46. PubMed ID: 11385873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling.
    Corominas LL; Rieger L; Takács I; Ekama G; Hauduc H; Vanrolleghem PA; Oehmen A; Gernaey KV; van Loosdrecht MC; Comeau Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(4):841-57. PubMed ID: 20182062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The HSG procedure for modelling integrated urban wastewater systems.
    Muschalla D; Schütze M; Schroeder K; Bach M; Blumensaat F; Gruber G; Klepiszewski K; Pabst M; Pressl A; Schindler N; Solvi AM; Wiese J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2065-75. PubMed ID: 19844053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advances in distributed parameter approach to the dynamics and control of activated sludge processes for wastewater treatment.
    Lee TT; Wang FY; Newell RB
    Water Res; 2006 Mar; 40(5):853-69. PubMed ID: 16458947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art.
    Phillips HM; Sahlstedt KE; Frank K; Bratby J; Brennan W; Rogowski S; Pier D; Anderson W; Mulas M; Copp JB; Shirodkar N
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 19237763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of artificial neural network black-box modeling for the prediction of wastewater treatment plants performance.
    Mjalli FS; Al-Asheh S; Alfadala HE
    J Environ Manage; 2007 May; 83(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16806660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mathematical modelling of small wastewater treatment plants: power and limitations.
    Philips N; Heyvaerts S; Lammens K; Van Impe JF
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):47-54. PubMed ID: 16104405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.