These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21278502)

  • 21. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A novel modular fetal ECG STAN and HRV analysis: Towards robust hypoxia detection.
    Martinek R; Kahankova R; Martin B; Nedoma J; Fajkus M
    Technol Health Care; 2019; 27(3):257-287. PubMed ID: 30562910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical experience with the STAN-PC--optical disc.
    Thoulon J; Dubost C; Kourouma A
    J Perinat Med; 1991; 19 Suppl 1():346-51. PubMed ID: 1779385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scientific and clinical evidence for the use of fetal ECG ST segment analysis (STAN).
    Steer PJ; Hvidman LE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 24597897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: Nordic observational multicenter study.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Bördahl P; Eikeland T; Hellsten C; Norén H; Sörnes T; Rosén KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Oct; 12(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 12572595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of STAN monitoring in the labour ward.
    Ragupathy K; Ismail F; Nicoll AE
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):465-9. PubMed ID: 20604648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The need for a new outlook on labor monitoring.
    Farine D; Shenhav M; Barnea O; Jaffa A; Fox HE
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 16690509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is intrapartum fever associated with ST-waveform changes of the fetal electrocardiogram? A retrospective cohort study.
    Becker JH; van Rijswijk J; Versteijnen B; Evers AC; van den Akker ES; van Beek E; Bolte AC; Rijnders RJ; Mol BW; Moons Kg; Porath MM; Drogtrop AP; Schuitemaker NW; Willekes C; Westerhuis ME; Visser GH; Kwee A
    BJOG; 2012 Oct; 119(11):1410-6. PubMed ID: 22827811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. STAN--the Gothenburg model for fetal surveillance during labour by ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram.
    Rosén KG; Lindecrantz K
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1989; 10 Suppl B():51-6. PubMed ID: 2698308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Intrapartum fetal monitoring: old or new techniques?].
    Carbonne B; Gougeul V; Fekih KM
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Feb; 32(1 Suppl):1S79-84. PubMed ID: 12592169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
    Graatsma EM; Jacod BC; van Egmond LA; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Need for extensive education when implementing new foetal monitoring technology].
    Colov NS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Sep; 169(39):3294-7. PubMed ID: 17953889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance.
    Amer-Wahlin I; Arulkumaran S; Hagberg H; Marsál K; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1191-3. PubMed ID: 17877671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combined cardiotocographic and ST event analysis: A review.
    Amer-Wahlin I; Kwee A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():48-61. PubMed ID: 26206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrapartum fetal monitoring today.
    Schwartz N; Young BK
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 16519612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R; Peters CH; Sluijter RJ; Mischi M; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R; Kelnar M; Koudelka P; Vanus J; Bilik P; Janku P; Nazeran H; Zidek J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.